From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: "git add -u" broken in git 1.7.4? Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:49:17 -0800 Message-ID: <7voc6ntt0i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4D4DEDC4.4080708@hartwork.org> <20110206051333.GA3458@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4D4EF7E4.7050303@hartwork.org> <7vwrlcv1ea.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110207055314.GA5511@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vhbcguytf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110207210257.GA14963@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthieu Moy , Junio C Hamano , Sebastian Pipping , Git ML To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 07 22:49:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PmYxl-0002lx-6Y for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:49:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754989Ab1BGVtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:49:31 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:53210 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750929Ab1BGVta (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:49:30 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD13D48FD; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:50:27 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=iBkjHorkh9EOMB9GdEHYJUjzYTw=; b=g4liVD a7bNtE5QzIp7BSvFpKY4tvV393JGf7XON/NQ0cK2mUcLek8J7PkDq4SUQPOATaYE POO7CPKl/2aGaWQTyXx3IAdVDxV+XHRWfV25kKfJcSJYwI62ONhNdDAR+lcy7dhl XBp6v8OFMityOe4WxUfk293B28hF+3qfp+Pys= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YNEWTGivKFglZxluSlRkCQoAxLWfGQTZ NjBk003MbxF12wBTvmegNMxVMWowtz5VcwGuxUdyiLHc5D9b2tt0US5+la5Kkmn0 dTYi76M0J93mFWOuUEM0fSRDbvDKrHqlcLZhA57Es3yfBDKvvVaV3nmbk0LZ39ma J5Q/YpC2fIA= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADAB48FB; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:50:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 985D548FA; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 16:50:16 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20110207210257.GA14963@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon\, 7 Feb 2011 16\:02\:57 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 43F1A584-3304-11E0-BDFA-F13235C70CBC-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > So I think there is less "we do it one way, and this is the outlier" and > more "we are horribly inconsistent". Yeah, didn't I say I used to be the third camp which I find is hard to jusitify, and am open to consistency either way?