From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] Document the HTTP transport protocol Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:26:28 -0700 Message-ID: <7vochwijaz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1255065768-10428-1-git-send-email-spearce@spearce.org> <1255065768-10428-2-git-send-email-spearce@spearce.org> <7v1vetkt8i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git list , "Shawn O. Pearce" To: Scott Chacon X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 06 19:26:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzCY1-0005MH-Kl for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:26:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755773Ab0DFR0k convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:26:40 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:43884 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751371Ab0DFR0i convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:26:38 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9E2A8179; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:26:37 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=AzCs9TotJW9h rnndoDTEhLZeLiA=; b=HCqus0tiOhAidaULE81VZvf580idrehvSQr9qSvZAZoj I82ReZYhuE3LxKhVkSAYZPe3whQ1KkQnaS/rxu7fM9QicU5Eus19yyMBP56wN3aw YjVR0ddgtspmS/Ygg5WoFtdX0BA4adb5mzSATJ8JMhLtAyku54y2widriY6z49A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=q2swSk Sn3KOSYwlTkxUKcBArNM4xNI8K2pUKehYWaV6Yy3zHqlfDPwWlkc+ZvsuH5dhAfg CQYqEoR7jboQFdPHB54Bn+U/2MPmVDgB3ikr4OklrObCcyIHTLm/4ba0DofBtoPG WivsGuBf3JmkLnnNdEmWEzvg0mjWnK8wWCM9Y= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AEAA8178; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:26:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA159A8177; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:26:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Scott Chacon's message of "Tue\, 6 Apr 2010 06\:53\:13 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8C4E3F5E-41A1-11DF-8377-D033EE7EF46B-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Scott Chacon writes: > I understand, it wasn't meant as a criticism, I was just curious why > this file was never included. =C2=A0That the series was marked as RFC= makes > sense. =C2=A0Could I request that this one patch be included? =C2=A0O= r if Shawn > has a more recent one? I also understand and I didn't mean to sound as if I took offense. I v= ery much appreciate reminders like yours of old discussions and patches tha= t were basically good but did not reach conclusion at the end to avoid wasted effort. A pointer is good, but if you are reviving an old patch, it would be much easier if you did a resend/forward for people to comment in-line, by the way.