From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] show: obey --textconv for blobs Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:49:44 -0800 Message-ID: <7vr4kt9f53.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20130205201106.GA29248@sigill.intra.peff.net> <883f0163cb732932061a368ea9bc187c13e4ecca.1360162813.git.git@drmicha.warpmail.net> <7vmwvhmli7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130206221240.GC27507@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michael J Gruber , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 07 00:50:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Ekl-000600-AC for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:50:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758005Ab3BFXts (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:49:48 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:52399 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755489Ab3BFXtr (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:49:47 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB011B2F5; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:49:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=5VhmSZ0lsD70/R/wwoTil0YDVuU=; b=II+aWR ML6rB4Wl4a4nIGDsgMbKPow7Pi/vo5oyjfVG8YP4EUyfsYria7GaInw6TESwnTPt WRE2QoSKMr3GVSJrOsQchlsJIuugfk8AlQJ7cs4cv80/fIKupHD0pdxQL5SgKtXt ORv6qLRKRQVKKP6Crc29Gs+huwjktKfrwToQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=A066B1ZpaasOA5U54ICdvR7SWEnvFVML 4lvPt8Nai4tw4OsADeTkmorMIyhQ7jCXtFsJrd1pTFSudBiVOIageDrL+lhv64JF CAroNMANTfb9JJFqzjtFrRU0S6H/P/HnNLteZt8caoZflllY8vUm/3F83+Qn3jk3 xKFDjM4EeTw= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1F7B2F4; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:49:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 313E1B2F0; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:49:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20130206221240.GC27507@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:12:40 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E2DEA2BC-70B7-11E2-984A-BCD12E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > And stating it that way makes it clear that there may be other missing > steps (3 and up) to apply other gitattributes. For example, should "git > show $blob" respect crlf attributes? Smudge filters? Yeah, I think applying these when path is availble may make sense. Are we going to teach cat-file to honor them with "--textconv" and possibly other new options? Or should the "--textconv" imply application of these other filters? I am tempted to say yes, but I haven't thought things through...