From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-add--interactive: manual hunk editing mode Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:54:39 -0700 Message-ID: <7vskutkvnk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080701101114.GA6379@sigill.intra.peff.net> <1214912674-9443-1-git-send-email-trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 02 01:56:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KDpiD-0001AV-Jv for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:56:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755271AbYGAXy4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 19:54:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754944AbYGAXy4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 19:54:56 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:50847 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755190AbYGAXyz (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 19:54:55 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2426026746; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 19:54:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7838E26736; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 19:54:47 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1A027542-47C9-11DD-A3ED-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Thomas Rast writes: > Jeff King wrote: >> Now that this is in next, maybe it is a good time to repost the >> add--interactive patch (it should be independent of Dscho's 2/2 "add -e" >> patch). > > It is independent, so I suppose you're right. (Dscho mentioned in > passing he might repost "add -e" himself.) Thanks, both.