From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/18] do_for_each_reflog(): use a strbuf to hold logfile name Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 13:06:58 -0700 Message-ID: <7vwr4ugxel.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1335479227-7877-1-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <1335479227-7877-9-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <4F9A5FE6.40409@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Jakub Narebski , Heiko Voigt , Johan Herland , Christian Couder To: Michael Haggerty X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 02 22:07:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPfpO-0001gS-Mb for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:07:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756892Ab2EBUHD (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2012 16:07:03 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:55716 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756196Ab2EBUHB (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2012 16:07:01 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091F47CFD; Wed, 2 May 2012 16:07:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=1li4t7dVW9alevnxDKhmudTzWMY=; b=KFJ9ij qYN2rYBGCkr1tY7wD06OgjgMfaVXi9zmgkjEMYvM8B+WrH9pcPANV7ZQfv/WBkdh R2K7zMHZam7s92lcp6FSzRo+9IrSk6JCOkb1MJvsdzDRJKFL27BENg67iO2xSy94 13/xfi3fBnidXxObN/JwpiwspUHEK2Z29s7cw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=DV3hG8Syh/UPdRQPTORbGBcHsBV4+97c KrCgvIywCUhb5nTlNAuHjqHGYrr0NgTo7KD7fX5vW91zmd0GAllrag4DAPEdz5Q0 RiYGWKDZI8WhjKeWNBsSyi5p4X5VcpgtOnwRxryMvB3UKkYI5HV9q3NwCLAnTt8P nVPPpWpfG+E= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC4A7CFB; Wed, 2 May 2012 16:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 660B97CF8; Wed, 2 May 2012 16:07:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4F9A5FE6.40409@alum.mit.edu> (Michael Haggerty's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:59:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6098D0E0-9492-11E1-8543-FC762E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael Haggerty writes: > On 04/27/2012 01:25 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Please write this like this: >> >> if (...) { >> ; /* silently ignore */ >> } >> >> to make the "emptyness" stand out (I amended the previous round when I >> queued them to 'pu', but I forgot to point it out in my review message). > > OK. A similar construct is in patch 2 of the same series. I've fixed > them in my repo and will use the fixed versions if there are any > future re-rolls. OK. Has there been any re-roll I missed, or is what I have in 'pu' with fixups ready for 'next'?