From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Split fetch and merge logic Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:22:56 -0800 Message-ID: <7vwt2i7bq7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <874ppmplw7.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Git Mailing List To: Santi =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9jar?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 16 09:23:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HHyMv-00009e-9z for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:23:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966201AbXBPIW6 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:22:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966203AbXBPIW6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:22:58 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.241.45]:58222 "EHLO fed1rmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966201AbXBPIW5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:22:57 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070216082258.MDBP1300.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:22:58 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Q8Nw1W00G1kojtg0000000; Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:22:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874ppmplw7.fsf@gmail.com> (Santi =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=A9jar's?= message of "Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:06:00 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Santi B=C3=A9jar writes: > This series implements the split of the fetch and merge logic. That's a description of what it does, but could you describe what problem it solves, please? The approach of presentation to introduce the test and showing the behavior change in a later patch is very good, though.