From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:58:03 -0800 Message-ID: <7vzmatqpb8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <87k61yt1x2.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <455A1137.8030301@shadowen.org> <87hcx1u934.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <87bqn9u43s.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <7vbqn9y6w6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v3b8ltq7r.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:20:51 -0500 (EST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GkCr5-00068o-RD for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:58:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966644AbWKOE6L (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:58:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966646AbWKOE6L (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:58:11 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:14060 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966644AbWKOE6J (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:58:09 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061115045809.QFAK20330.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:58:09 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id msyE1V00l1kojtg0000000; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 23:58:15 -0500 To: Nicolas Pitre Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Nicolas Pitre writes: > ... We simply won't gain anything trying to teach people "a pull > in HG is a download in GIT". If a pull becomes the same thing for both > then it's one less oddball in the GIT interface. I personally do not have any issue with that, as long as you would help us convert existing users that what was known as pull is not available and new pull means fetching only. If I recall correctly in this thread, you also advocated to always have tracking branches. I am a bit worried about losing the promiscuous pull usage, which can easily become a regression for people like Linus in the integrator role unless done with an escape hatch.