From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751512AbdBWPXx (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:23:53 -0500 Received: from smtpout.microchip.com ([198.175.253.82]:42555 "EHLO email.microchip.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751367AbdBWPXt (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:23:49 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: add support to allow run time changing of pwm parameters To: Alexandre Belloni References: <1487839120-13650-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <1487839120-13650-3-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <20170223092148.5qmxy62xkufwbsrw@piout.net> <20170223103239.tv6nodddlar5l5fl@piout.net> CC: , , , , , , , , , , From: m18063 Message-ID: <8123991c-5e3c-ad5c-bbf3-bcd7ee2a5e5e@microchip.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:22:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170223103239.tv6nodddlar5l5fl@piout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23.02.2017 12:32, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 23/02/2017 at 12:25:58 +0200, m18063 wrote: >>> It is probably worth switching to atomic PWM instead of changing this >>> function. This would simplify the whole driver. >> I was thinking to switch to atomic PWM in a future patch. > Then why wait ? > > I wanted to do it in progressively: - enable the support for SAMA5d2 - make it work based on what is currently implemented - add atomic PWM support. Anyway, please ignore this patch. I will do it in atomic PWM way. Thank you, Claudiu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: m18063 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: add support to allow run time changing of pwm parameters Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:22:36 +0200 Message-ID: <8123991c-5e3c-ad5c-bbf3-bcd7ee2a5e5e@microchip.com> References: <1487839120-13650-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <1487839120-13650-3-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <20170223092148.5qmxy62xkufwbsrw@piout.net> <20170223103239.tv6nodddlar5l5fl@piout.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170223103239.tv6nodddlar5l5fl-m++hUPXGwpdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org, galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 23.02.2017 12:32, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 23/02/2017 at 12:25:58 +0200, m18063 wrote: >>> It is probably worth switching to atomic PWM instead of changing this >>> function. This would simplify the whole driver. >> I was thinking to switch to atomic PWM in a future patch. > Then why wait ? > > I wanted to do it in progressively: - enable the support for SAMA5d2 - make it work based on what is currently implemented - add atomic PWM support. Anyway, please ignore this patch. I will do it in atomic PWM way. Thank you, Claudiu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com (m18063) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:22:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: add support to allow run time changing of pwm parameters In-Reply-To: <20170223103239.tv6nodddlar5l5fl@piout.net> References: <1487839120-13650-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <1487839120-13650-3-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <20170223092148.5qmxy62xkufwbsrw@piout.net> <20170223103239.tv6nodddlar5l5fl@piout.net> Message-ID: <8123991c-5e3c-ad5c-bbf3-bcd7ee2a5e5e@microchip.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 23.02.2017 12:32, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 23/02/2017 at 12:25:58 +0200, m18063 wrote: >>> It is probably worth switching to atomic PWM instead of changing this >>> function. This would simplify the whole driver. >> I was thinking to switch to atomic PWM in a future patch. > Then why wait ? > > I wanted to do it in progressively: - enable the support for SAMA5d2 - make it work based on what is currently implemented - add atomic PWM support. Anyway, please ignore this patch. I will do it in atomic PWM way. Thank you, Claudiu