From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lj1-f171.google.com ([209.85.208.171]:41786 "EHLO mail-lj1-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728515AbeHaRw3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:52:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/23] wireless: remove unnecessary unlikely() To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Igor Stoppa , Christian Lamparter , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <20180830223429.30051-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> <20180830223429.30051-11-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> <87va7qdfry.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> From: Igor Stoppa Message-ID: <814defe0-72ab-049b-97cb-f295f4964895@gmail.com> (sfid-20180831_154527_806123_67EADF08) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:44:52 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87va7qdfry.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 31/08/18 12:52, Kalle Valo wrote: > + linux-wireless > IMHO you could fold patches 10, 11 and 12 into one to avoid having three > patches with duplicate titles. Or alternatively use proper driver > prefixes like "ath10k:", "b43:" and so on. I was wondering if it would be ok to fold them, but it's easier to fold than to split, so I started with 3 > But how do you want these to be applied? For the wireless patches you > didn't Cc linux-wireless so our patchwork won't see them and hence I > can't take them. So if you want me to take these, please resend and > include linux-wireless. ok, I was hoping to avoid joining the ml but it's done I had patches for about 20 different trees, so I decided to first see if the patches could be taken in right away. In at least one case (pinctrl) I got lucky :-) -- thanks, igor