Hi Philippe,

On Wed, 24 Aug 2022, Philippe Blain wrote:

> Le 2022-08-24 à 17:21, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget a écrit :
> > Philippe Blain reported in
> > https://lore.kernel.org/git/ecf6f5be-22ca-299f-a8f1-bda38e5ca246@gmail.com
> > that there is a problem when running the built-in version of git add -p with
> > diff-so-fancy [https://github.com/so-fancy/diff-so-fancy] as diff colorizer.
> > The symptom is this:
> >
> >     error: could not parse colored hunk header '?[36m?[1m?[38;5;13m@ file:1 @?[1m?[0m'
> >
> >
> > This patch series addresses that and should fix
> > https://github.com/so-fancy/diff-so-fancy/issues/437
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> >
> >  * Added a commit to ignore dirty submodules just like the Perl version
> >    does.
> >
> > Johannes Schindelin (4):
> >   t3701: redefine what is "bogus" output of a diff filter
> >   add -p: gracefully ignore unparseable hunk headers in colored diffs
> >   add -p: handle `diff-so-fancy`'s hunk headers better
> >   add -p: ignore dirty submodules
> >
> >  add-patch.c                | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> >  t/t3701-add-interactive.sh | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 795ea8776befc95ea2becd8020c7a284677b4161
> > Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1336%2Fdscho%2Fdiff-so-fancy-v2
> > Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1336/dscho/diff-so-fancy-v2
> > Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1336
> >
> > Range-diff vs v1:
> >
> >  1:  74ab50eeb1c = 1:  74ab50eeb1c t3701: redefine what is "bogus" output of a diff filter
> >  2:  b07f85a0359 = 2:  b07f85a0359 add -p: gracefully ignore unparseable hunk headers in colored diffs
> >  3:  9dac9f74d2e = 3:  9dac9f74d2e add -p: handle `diff-so-fancy`'s hunk headers better
> >  -:  ----------- > 4:  540ce27c38a add -p: ignore dirty submodules
> >
>
> Thanks, 4/4 fixes the mismatched output bug. Just after I sent my last email,
> I asked myself "but why does 'git add -p' presents dirty submodule to the user,
> as they can't be staged?" :)
>
> A small question about 2/4, any reason why you did not use a "Reported-by:"
> trailer ? Not that I care that much, but I think using such a trailer is more
> standard, and makes for easier statistics as it's more parseable :)

Good suggestion.

How about adding your review? I'll then add a "Reviewed-by:" trailer, too
;-)

Ciao,
Dscho