From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] net/i40e: configurable PTYPE mapping Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 22:22:40 +0200 Message-ID: <8195227.QCEXF4XZSi@xps13> References: <20170404015516.7784-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> <7f5ba680-9b10-dde5-fef2-5b245f928c93@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit , jingjing.wu@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com, Jerin Jacob , Jianbo Liu , Chao Zhu To: Qi Zhang Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com (mail-wr0-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAED326C for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 22:22:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w11so221222119wrc.3 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 13:22:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7f5ba680-9b10-dde5-fef2-5b245f928c93@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2017-04-04 10:30, Ferruh Yigit: > On 4/4/2017 2:55 AM, Qi Zhang wrote: > > The patch set create new APIs that help to change the mapping from hardware > > defined packet type to software defined packet type for i40e NICs. > > Keep these APIs private is because currently they are only meaningful for > > devices that support dynamic PTYPE configuration, which may not be a general > > device feature. [...] > > Qi Zhang (3): > > net/i40e: enable per dev PTYPE mapping table > > net/i40e: configurable PTYPE mapping > > app/testpmd: add CL for ptype mapping configure > > Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. It does not compile for ARM (not tested for POWER): drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c: In function '_recv_raw_pkts_vec': 229:2: error: unknown type name 'uint32' uint32 *ptype_tbl = rxq->vsi->adapter->ptype_tbl; Given that - it changes NEON and Altivec code - it does not compile on ARM - there is no Ack from NEON or Altivec maintainers (they were not Cc'ed) I really doubt it has been tested. That's why it won't be in RC1. If NEON and Altivec maintainers agree, we can give it a chance for RC2. PS: please use --in-reply-to to let us check the discussion history.