From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D98C4332F for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 10:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229717AbiJRKzx (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:55:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55164 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229678AbiJRKzv (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:55:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FF5B2F for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id i6so13425208pli.12 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:55:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:cc:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vLINuXNLtU9OTTNSNyr45b8tgX2olJkHTaYrlc4FLMY=; b=AvvfJJx5gAzzk6lxK+wd26zIA6hvsiPk1ZtVSUKFG3/50sy259nGJXfpSB94Bzuamj t4Nw47eoT/kZxK5eNCu9BFqsTZVuhQcbmbQGEsU6KOcyOCKSYxEahLPkToN0eio5iZnT 7TxXc9DPGbgM6N/Pkg3Bl/JiAgIkJmAFRQHwj0xrY4GAGPQ6dJUclzFccaeMRCNSmdp6 GS6TPYCffisqFhXDejrK2nLvdbEFNsADuLTvsLlr1jcAeBV5zXc7407O0vLqlqFlXnoe D1JRYmkiO2oMQb8CXEcSHi4YTHGzo6md9eqGnjvVsrlu9G82dU6FUgF9H1mRJ7pByL2i LBQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:cc:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vLINuXNLtU9OTTNSNyr45b8tgX2olJkHTaYrlc4FLMY=; b=Fc6UEiRC4OSse+jOuVNkKCFUsrFCA1IU5Xj/H3lBl/LW12WpPzpBFOE8+/9bTfSgda xslSGtUtVedA3f189IKvc2LP4uUmzoPEnIz0BSFC/ePpb07BG2IJPxQi2gTNTVuYbu3k Oxrbmpuvh6t1OkJH/63ocSGO2kRcM1iTjXg8a3euY7HowQTnUymIiYEV8VlbbclUJq92 8XAtmDwKXKd1D+orDQP5mT6mzEl8mufvwN9HSCFEXcVdZsCY4glzijYMvLOS6iOw/H2o G1DwI9Jgdfx7mGMfda+4AMb1jYzJukYLCqeBwUm8tlwsl/F+K8XXE9sCt8l2m+cd5IRl detg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2RB60zLwqywbAYc4+P0ZzlDjRYnXrIM2x17BPCwAeJDVCY646v fIlNW+KKG4HoymFMj437Uxn+Pw6tAhEJNz7H X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5VtbTfwhbV3RfqUQUJRdioqFYoASfbuOal1sg3LVaYGyCoBtPU6VKQB2TskT1XFAn0+5Fhtw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e40a:b0:183:f90:2fb with SMTP id m10-20020a170902e40a00b001830f9002fbmr2652844ple.28.1666090549306; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs02-180-214-232-86.three.co.id. [180.214.232.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b8-20020a17090a7ac800b00205d70ccfeesm11063883pjl.33.2022.10.18.03.55.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <81aa8527-af8c-aff9-f805-5412a0531238@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 17:55:45 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.3 Subject: Re: 6.0.0-RC kernels trigger Firefox snap bug with 6.0.0-rc3 through 6.0.0-rc7 Content-Language: en-US To: Mirsad Todorovac References: <29362d2e-eec6-5a23-4354-cf8868d50b2c@alu.unizg.hr> <6375f31f-316a-bebc-6aec-c6241049e401@alu.unizg.hr> <7e0b733d-db73-f9a7-0965-4744e63f1a33@gmail.com> Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list From: Bagas Sanjaya In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org On 10/18/22 16:36, Mirsad Todorovac wrote: > Hi Bagas, > > It would be a great speed improvement for my testing kernels if ccache gcc worked > for me, so I wonder if you could give me some advice. > > I tried the latest binary release (compiling on our Debian 10 Buster is impossible due > to prerequisites required), however, it did not work though I saw that it cached > objs, but it also recompiled them each time. > > Now that the building cycle of 90 minutes appears too long, it would be prudent to > have the ccaching system working. > > Are you willing to give some advice? > CC'ing linux-kbuild list, since people there may know this issue. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara