From: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Bo Yang <struggleyb.nku@gmail.com>,
gitzilla@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GSoC draft proposal: Line-level history browser
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:39:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81b0412b1003220339n80ab38bh9e1a70c197538ac2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhbo8syyf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 06:32, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> While I don't seriously buy "multiple files" either, if that is really
yeah, _really_
> needed, I could be pursuaded with "log -- path1:10-15 path2:1-7", or
> "log -L path1:10-15 -Lpath2:1-7 -- path1 path2" or something similarly
> ugly like these, but that is not how we generally name things, and it
> probably shouldn't be a new option to "log" anymore.
But then, how about putting the "path" last in the argument,
so that the unambiguosly defined part of the format comes first?
Less need for quoting of ":" (or "@") in pathnames.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-22 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-20 9:18 GSoC draft proposal: Line-level history browser Bo Yang
2010-03-20 11:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-03-20 13:10 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-20 13:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-21 6:03 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-20 13:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-03-21 6:05 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-20 20:35 ` Alex Riesen
2010-03-20 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-21 6:10 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-20 21:58 ` A Large Angry SCM
2010-03-21 6:16 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-21 13:19 ` A Large Angry SCM
2010-03-22 3:48 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-22 4:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-22 4:34 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-22 5:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-22 7:31 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-22 7:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-22 7:52 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-22 8:10 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-23 6:01 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-23 10:08 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-03-23 10:38 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-23 11:22 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-03-23 12:23 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-23 13:49 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-03-23 15:23 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-23 19:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-23 21:51 ` A Large Angry SCM
2010-03-24 2:30 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-23 12:02 ` Peter Kjellerstedt
2010-03-23 18:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-24 2:39 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-24 4:02 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-03-22 10:39 ` Alex Riesen [this message]
2010-03-22 15:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-03-22 3:52 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-22 15:48 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-03-22 18:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-03-22 18:38 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-03-22 19:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-03-22 20:21 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-03-22 19:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-03-23 6:08 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-23 6:27 ` Bo Yang
[not found] ` <201003282120.40536.trast@student.ethz.ch>
2010-03-29 4:14 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-29 18:42 ` Thomas Rast
2010-03-30 2:52 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-30 9:07 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-03-30 9:38 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-03-30 11:10 ` Bo Yang
2010-03-30 9:10 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-03-30 11:15 ` Bo Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81b0412b1003220339n80ab38bh9e1a70c197538ac2@mail.gmail.com \
--to=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=gitzilla@gmail.com \
--cc=struggleyb.nku@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.