From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Osipenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:07:19 +0300 Message-ID: <820200ce-17f3-18c0-6f79-3e582f45492d@gmail.com> References: <6f07e5c8-7916-7ea2-2fe7-d05f8f011471@nvidia.com> <77a31b2f-f525-ba9e-f1ae-2b474465bde4@gmail.com> <470b4de4-e98a-1bdc-049e-6259ad603507@nvidia.com> <79f6560e-dbb5-0ae1-49f8-cf1cd95396ec@nvidia.com> <20200427074837.GC3451400@ulmo> <20200427084424.GA28817@kunai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200427084424.GA28817@kunai> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Wolfram Sang , Thierry Reding Cc: Jon Hunter , Laxman Dewangan , Manikanta Maddireddy , Vidya Sagar , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org 27.04.2020 11:44, Wolfram Sang пишет: > >> Wolfram, can you revert the following two patches for v5.7, please? >> >> 8814044fe0fa i2c: tegra: Synchronize DMA before termination This patch has nothing to do with your trouble, why do you want to revert it? >> a900aeac2537 i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time > > Sure, will do! > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD4BC5519B for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F36D2064A for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fAWwMpDE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726815AbgD0JHX (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:07:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40260 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726003AbgD0JHX (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:07:23 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x141.google.com (mail-lf1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::141]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01034C0610D5; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 02:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x141.google.com with SMTP id l11so13169531lfc.5; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 02:07:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sy/BiIF7MlDKyvs/3N6qGMthyzCx+6azEumh9x7zlKA=; b=fAWwMpDEZgjeFsLgESUWCr77pQtXlTPdOnuWsxubHrz+DJOML90wIbhFC3olJ/9M5y E+qrPN6HN0D0YJqBcrFskQViweSYf7dt6xR6BcD/d2Ai9+NKSGHff2dsMuBhlnGJCwX5 UwezvA2iKqxKtjsAAklSd2S18Bf3q6LeGqHuNwQWarow1vaTszrMqZ8WXzZ6yyhC5olz 5m6Qqa3/grMNGM/wmUK+g5hStmp0aLZvX/Bw4jYO88JyjtbSZBHVKVT3CQTT6RENZO4b wbvCVJWwoaPad8kld6XGDHEvD2vh5O5/zenElQC41EoUDf4yYH2Nxo1k7aPA+BJaE2Cq xZoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sy/BiIF7MlDKyvs/3N6qGMthyzCx+6azEumh9x7zlKA=; b=TY9IriMgv9WgWRnCoQIW9kVfagcgLLAmsXkmEgVjW+6LluXzKeteDGZUL9DwSP1SzY ZsIuelfStkFlYi9gi3roRoGb33COMSqDmhnpOMNBVgsDJwXSdvD3tBAmSMtU4RGa+1ak 7WWbvF8bzYgzyML5wGVItOQPwxVv1pSJzKo99LbXwK2Ihoos22zRXcjqLnmHDnZTQ6U+ yAydMYjSZo2DMltTpMEreLIhWxcXklF5K0PGVJixksQ4m3j6YgiJVp6PsMpc4WmZsJxP EO5twXaaYh9aB8VJhAtyX8aIeVE+a70jkvWcLStA//jJjiZif6iRkDRBQI03skWJOugQ JWZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZrMQSsoaIUMPZsDB8/PmLzC7ZY9JiB5qOD9FTTGcn3qMamIRzx sXVm0+q/AVIZCBYzj4lEWozOy4yE X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKTpD3mFp0Z5Xq1WcHmOAiYtei5qhCQm7A0dwP45V/+Ap6sUukXL1MJW2Nq7MZJFTfYGpX44Q== X-Received: by 2002:a19:dcc:: with SMTP id 195mr14919048lfn.193.1587978441240; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 02:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.145] (ppp91-78-208-152.pppoe.mtu-net.ru. [91.78.208.152]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm12205240lfc.72.2020.04.27.02.07.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 02:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time To: Wolfram Sang , Thierry Reding Cc: Jon Hunter , Laxman Dewangan , Manikanta Maddireddy , Vidya Sagar , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <6f07e5c8-7916-7ea2-2fe7-d05f8f011471@nvidia.com> <77a31b2f-f525-ba9e-f1ae-2b474465bde4@gmail.com> <470b4de4-e98a-1bdc-049e-6259ad603507@nvidia.com> <79f6560e-dbb5-0ae1-49f8-cf1cd95396ec@nvidia.com> <20200427074837.GC3451400@ulmo> <20200427084424.GA28817@kunai> From: Dmitry Osipenko Message-ID: <820200ce-17f3-18c0-6f79-3e582f45492d@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:07:19 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200427084424.GA28817@kunai> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 27.04.2020 11:44, Wolfram Sang пишет: > >> Wolfram, can you revert the following two patches for v5.7, please? >> >> 8814044fe0fa i2c: tegra: Synchronize DMA before termination This patch has nothing to do with your trouble, why do you want to revert it? >> a900aeac2537 i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time > > Sure, will do! >