From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757511AbcJXV1r (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:27:47 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f65.google.com ([209.85.213.65]:34946 "EHLO mail-vk0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755128AbcJXV1n (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:27:43 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for Broadcom OTP controller To: Linus Torvalds References: <1477336324-10543-1-git-send-email-jonathan.richardson@broadcom.com> Cc: Jonathan Richardson , Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime Ripard , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , lkml , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Scott Branden , Ray Jui , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: <82ad10b1-32ab-3962-d5ab-e787e2c70130@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:27:36 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/24/2016 01:14 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> >> The older setup was using smtphost.broadcom.com which we have now >> documented as being invalid, here Jonathan used gmail directly (since >> that's our mail provider now): >> >> Received: from lbrmn-lnxub108.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([216.31.219.19]) >> by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id >> s89sm8325746qkl.44.2016.10.24.12.12.00 >> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); >> Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:12:03 -0700 (PDT) > > Hmm. I get that too, so if that's the right thing for a broadcom.com > address, it's not the smtp server issue. > > We had a few cases of the kernel mailing list itself messing up emails > sufficiently to fail dkim, but that shouldn't be an issue for the > relaxed/relaxed model that broadcom uses (the vger mailing list > software screws up whitespace, which "relaxed" ignores). > >> Is there something else we need to check? Here is what I read for the >> cover-letter: >> >> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >> dkim=pass header.i=@broadcom.com; >> spf=pass (google.com: domain of ... > > Hmm. I get: > > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; > dkim=fail header.i=@broadcom.com; > > with the actual dkim signature looking like this: > > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=broadcom.com; s=google; > h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; > bh=9zStGnsZQDQqP6cm1CHPk7EYVtLvDsm2wN5qy5Mgx7M=; > b=Z/1QD+FwJogJY9D8Qd197Q+VJt7Tr9+WoHFeKYRL00yhvxrMg0P8jKj1FbucJTluvM > agC2eq9qCpZcNAfridjExDRDCuUPAIJIXTr9Npkpqlk6gEMq2FysrGer2D9Z4HQ/atTX > 67VirFsQK0gK7impYMn9kW5Q9BIIw5bOg7OdI= > > and those fields that it protects look like this: > > From: Jonathan Richardson > To: Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime > Ripard > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland > , Rob Herring , Scott > Branden , Ray Jui , > bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Jonathan Richardson > > Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for Broadcom OTP controller > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:12:01 -0700 > Message-Id: <1477336324-10543-1-git-send-email-jonathan.richardson@broadcom.com> > > and I don't see anything obviously wrong anywhere - except for that > "dkim=fail" thing, and the email being in my spam folder. Should we compare the headers added by lists.infradead.org and see what could possibly go wrong here? I can see that by being delivered to lists.infradead.org and then back to my personal gmail.com (not my other broadcom.com account), there are a bunch of extra headers: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20161024_121226_013940_81319C20 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.05 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.7 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2607:f8b0:400d:c09:0:0:0:22f listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list Would those be used by your mail client to put this mail in spam, or was that done by the linux-foundation.org (also gmail?) mail upon reception? -- Florian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for Broadcom OTP controller Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:27:36 -0700 Message-ID: <82ad10b1-32ab-3962-d5ab-e787e2c70130@gmail.com> References: <1477336324-10543-1-git-send-email-jonathan.richardson@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jonathan Richardson , Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime Ripard , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , lkml , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Scott Branden , Ray Jui , bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/24/2016 01:14 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> >> The older setup was using smtphost.broadcom.com which we have now >> documented as being invalid, here Jonathan used gmail directly (since >> that's our mail provider now): >> >> Received: from lbrmn-lnxub108.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([216.31.219.19]) >> by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id >> s89sm8325746qkl.44.2016.10.24.12.12.00 >> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); >> Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:12:03 -0700 (PDT) > > Hmm. I get that too, so if that's the right thing for a broadcom.com > address, it's not the smtp server issue. > > We had a few cases of the kernel mailing list itself messing up emails > sufficiently to fail dkim, but that shouldn't be an issue for the > relaxed/relaxed model that broadcom uses (the vger mailing list > software screws up whitespace, which "relaxed" ignores). > >> Is there something else we need to check? Here is what I read for the >> cover-letter: >> >> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >> dkim=pass header.i=@broadcom.com; >> spf=pass (google.com: domain of ... > > Hmm. I get: > > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; > dkim=fail header.i=@broadcom.com; > > with the actual dkim signature looking like this: > > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=broadcom.com; s=google; > h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; > bh=9zStGnsZQDQqP6cm1CHPk7EYVtLvDsm2wN5qy5Mgx7M=; > b=Z/1QD+FwJogJY9D8Qd197Q+VJt7Tr9+WoHFeKYRL00yhvxrMg0P8jKj1FbucJTluvM > agC2eq9qCpZcNAfridjExDRDCuUPAIJIXTr9Npkpqlk6gEMq2FysrGer2D9Z4HQ/atTX > 67VirFsQK0gK7impYMn9kW5Q9BIIw5bOg7OdI= > > and those fields that it protects look like this: > > From: Jonathan Richardson > To: Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime > Ripard > Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, > linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mark Rutland > , Rob Herring , Scott > Branden , Ray Jui , > bcm-kernel-feedback-list-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, Jonathan Richardson > > Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for Broadcom OTP controller > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:12:01 -0700 > Message-Id: <1477336324-10543-1-git-send-email-jonathan.richardson-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> > > and I don't see anything obviously wrong anywhere - except for that > "dkim=fail" thing, and the email being in my spam folder. Should we compare the headers added by lists.infradead.org and see what could possibly go wrong here? I can see that by being delivered to lists.infradead.org and then back to my personal gmail.com (not my other broadcom.com account), there are a bunch of extra headers: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20161024_121226_013940_81319C20 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.05 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.7 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2607:f8b0:400d:c09:0:0:0:22f listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list Would those be used by your mail client to put this mail in spam, or was that done by the linux-foundation.org (also gmail?) mail upon reception? -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:27:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for Broadcom OTP controller In-Reply-To: References: <1477336324-10543-1-git-send-email-jonathan.richardson@broadcom.com> Message-ID: <82ad10b1-32ab-3962-d5ab-e787e2c70130@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/24/2016 01:14 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> >> The older setup was using smtphost.broadcom.com which we have now >> documented as being invalid, here Jonathan used gmail directly (since >> that's our mail provider now): >> >> Received: from lbrmn-lnxub108.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([216.31.219.19]) >> by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id >> s89sm8325746qkl.44.2016.10.24.12.12.00 >> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); >> Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:12:03 -0700 (PDT) > > Hmm. I get that too, so if that's the right thing for a broadcom.com > address, it's not the smtp server issue. > > We had a few cases of the kernel mailing list itself messing up emails > sufficiently to fail dkim, but that shouldn't be an issue for the > relaxed/relaxed model that broadcom uses (the vger mailing list > software screws up whitespace, which "relaxed" ignores). > >> Is there something else we need to check? Here is what I read for the >> cover-letter: >> >> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; >> dkim=pass header.i=@broadcom.com; >> spf=pass (google.com: domain of ... > > Hmm. I get: > > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; > dkim=fail header.i=@broadcom.com; > > with the actual dkim signature looking like this: > > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=broadcom.com; s=google; > h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; > bh=9zStGnsZQDQqP6cm1CHPk7EYVtLvDsm2wN5qy5Mgx7M=; > b=Z/1QD+FwJogJY9D8Qd197Q+VJt7Tr9+WoHFeKYRL00yhvxrMg0P8jKj1FbucJTluvM > agC2eq9qCpZcNAfridjExDRDCuUPAIJIXTr9Npkpqlk6gEMq2FysrGer2D9Z4HQ/atTX > 67VirFsQK0gK7impYMn9kW5Q9BIIw5bOg7OdI= > > and those fields that it protects look like this: > > From: Jonathan Richardson > To: Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime > Ripard > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org, > linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org, devicetree at vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland > , Rob Herring , Scott > Branden , Ray Jui , > bcm-kernel-feedback-list at broadcom.com, Jonathan Richardson > > Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] Add support for Broadcom OTP controller > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:12:01 -0700 > Message-Id: <1477336324-10543-1-git-send-email-jonathan.richardson@broadcom.com> > > and I don't see anything obviously wrong anywhere - except for that > "dkim=fail" thing, and the email being in my spam folder. Should we compare the headers added by lists.infradead.org and see what could possibly go wrong here? I can see that by being delivered to lists.infradead.org and then back to my personal gmail.com (not my other broadcom.com account), there are a bunch of extra headers: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20161024_121226_013940_81319C20 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.05 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.7 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [2607:f8b0:400d:c09:0:0:0:22f listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list Would those be used by your mail client to put this mail in spam, or was that done by the linux-foundation.org (also gmail?) mail upon reception? -- Florian