From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 56559E00C93; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 02:20:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.128.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com (mail-wm1-f52.google.com [209.85.128.52]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8B9E00C46 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 02:20:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 4so6572652wmf.1 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 02:20:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OTKrYe8PfhWZizQ0m2QN2brrmG8tTXeVe5qw0xVxqGc=; b=bYGi5qwbTunD0y8Jny06XoFTZBT/FDj2dfsxkKku2tpZDggKRzTFy+q1k2QOvzZEuI PM0wEVoJWOSGY5ecI7lHz1laBIBEpLCt5gCMRUrouFGFmP2UQ2J7wsLsCmb8xaaf+l59 A8wE34NcWIdhSBhIE5cXm/BYWNjckTZJBTyBw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OTKrYe8PfhWZizQ0m2QN2brrmG8tTXeVe5qw0xVxqGc=; b=kbasAedsTJMIcKbvV1eWKNp6EBy+HfgQG6TyDRavJ2tOJIAKsyNwtFjZTNddBRvwlp rAEGQFf5PQzrBSmWqFhNb4fkbidTQoCTxrEf216qwiMJNhWCtSb932ibb0rT2T208QE3 qz9NnZtQai1jc5IdqjQV2aZcXsU+oCurQFxsPJ/XEHWu1VpIO8mir/GyZ8YK1PfWXw7g 24anL+IZs8F2ILULutZUFDy54wmUS6KYmWVw6p7ptC4/UlT2MHdLk/ei5sXiU9ou1jlf XFHbVNtkycL4OCs1HoAPdJpbWXM4wL/kUUJweKk337o/b/VuyRXbvqBYSvVm9hx+P5xU fRLw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW96jL7tweIxd2tWvvWr9nVsV1UtVAzTmZXZbvFoQFG+1Xy6qK2 9s6QYTc1cT3sJWNMyCy3lL32xA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBzOlbwEGg9FrzjrL4i1Vgc9UGHbmbcr3k1zog/m2uqOxEVx8vs/smOaptD8gJH1jyuKiEHg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e0c6:: with SMTP id x189mr1322604wmg.4.1554283203486; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 02:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hex (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com. [87.81.244.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l12sm20239539wrt.31.2019.04.03.02.20.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Apr 2019 02:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8322586b16a5bda01770480f7096837c13d26f6b.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org To: "Jain, Sangeeta" , Poky Build User , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , "sjolley.yp.pm@gmail.com" , Yi Zhao Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:20:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <015AB11D45F2C442929CB2765DAE738634DB02DA@PGSMSX110.gar.corp.intel.com> References: <20190328033000.C90DF1C2149@ubuntu1604-ty-1.yocto.io> <015AB11D45F2C442929CB2765DAE738634DB02DA@PGSMSX110.gar.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.0-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "akuster808@gmail.com" , "Chan, Aaron Chun Yew" , "otavio@ossystems.com.br" Subject: Re: QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.6.2.rc3) X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 09:20:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, This is good information and helps a lot, thanks! I had a question below. On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 08:06 +0000, Jain, Sangeeta wrote: > Intel and WR YP QA is now working on QA execution for YP build 2.6.2 > RC3. We are planning to execute following tests for this cycle: > > OEQA-Manual tests for following modules: > 1. SDK > 2. Eclipse-plugin > 3. Kernel > 4. Toaster > 5. Bitbake (oe-core) > 6. Build-appliance > 7. Crops > 8. Compliance-test > 9. Bsp-hw > 10. Bsp-qemu > > Runtime auto test for following platforms: > > 1. MinnowTurbo 32bit > 2. MinnowTurbot 64 bit > 3. NUC 7 > 4. NUC 6 > 5. Edgerouter > 6. MPC8315e-rdb > 7. Beaglebone > 8. Qemuarm > 9. Qemuarm-64 > 10. Qemuppc > 11. Qemumips > 12. Qemumips64 I'm wondering if there is any difference between items 8-12 here and the runtime testing we run on the public autobuilder? Is there some testing we're missing on the public autobuilder? Cheers, Richard