From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC7FC433FE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 18:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236066AbiADSCH (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2022 13:02:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47596 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234460AbiADSCG (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2022 13:02:06 -0500 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8234::]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0253AC061761; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:02:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ip4d173d02.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.23.61.2] helo=[192.168.66.200]); authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1n4o8K-0008OH-5f; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 19:02:04 +0100 Message-ID: <832e4888-f002-6930-ab91-a5d73e16dbd5@leemhuis.info> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 19:02:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Content-Language: en-BS To: Randy Dunlap , Jonathan Corbet , Lukas Bulwahn Cc: "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , workflows@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <9a68f2fcb5fe599b76e278a61928e23eb950cd83.1641203216.git.linux@leemhuis.info> <87sfu3woj1.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <43cb0393-c161-f853-144d-f28c6557154f@infradead.org> From: Thorsten Leemhuis Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] docs: regressions.rst: rules of thumb for handling regressions In-Reply-To: <43cb0393-c161-f853-144d-f28c6557154f@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;linux@leemhuis.info;1641319326;17e607b6; X-HE-SMSGID: 1n4o8K-0008OH-5f Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04.01.22 16:09, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 1/4/22 06:42, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Thorsten Leemhuis writes: >> >>> On 04.01.22 13:16, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:23 PM Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>>> +Try to fix regressions quickly once the culprit got identified. Fixes for most >>>> >>>> s/got/gets/ --- at least, that is what the gmail grammar spelling suggests :) >>> >>> Hmm, LanguageTool didn't complain. Not totally sure, maybe both >>> approaches are okay. But the variant suggested by the gmail checker >>> might be the better one. >> >> So we're deeply into nit territory, but "gets" would be the correct >> tense there. Even better, though, is to avoid using "to get" in this >> way at all. I'm informed that "to get" is one of the hardest verbs for >> non-native speakers, well, to get, so I try to avoid it in my own >> writing. "once the culprit is identified" or "has been identified" >> would both be good here. > > Agreed. Any uses of the verb get/got are best avoided. Ahh, good to known, thx to both of you. I guess my English teachers tried to put that into my head like 30 years ago, but I assume the lossy compression algorithm in there threw it away... Went through the document and removed all get/got, was not that hard most of the time. Ciao, Thorsten