All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
Cc: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, dan.daly@intel.com,
	cunming.liang@intel.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
	jason.zeng@intel.com, zhiyuan.lv@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] vhost: IFC VF hardware operation layer
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:36:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83356b5f-e2f4-ab79-79d7-20d4850c26a9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023101329.GE8732@netronome.com>


On 2019/10/23 下午6:13, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:32:36AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 2019/10/22 上午12:31, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 05:55:33PM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>>>> On 10/16/2019 5:53 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>>> Hi Zhu,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for your patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 09:10:40AM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>>> +static void ifcvf_read_dev_config(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u64 offset,
>>>>>> +		       void *dst, int length)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +	int i;
>>>>>> +	u8 *p;
>>>>>> +	u8 old_gen, new_gen;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	do {
>>>>>> +		old_gen = ioread8(&hw->common_cfg->config_generation);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		p = dst;
>>>>>> +		for (i = 0; i < length; i++)
>>>>>> +			*p++ = ioread8((u8 *)hw->dev_cfg + offset + i);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		new_gen = ioread8(&hw->common_cfg->config_generation);
>>>>>> +	} while (old_gen != new_gen);
>>>>> Would it be wise to limit the number of iterations of the loop above?
>>>> Thanks but I don't quite get it. This is used to make sure the function
>>>> would get the latest config.
>>> I am worried about the possibility that it will loop forever.
>>> Could that happen?
>>>
>>> ...
>> My understanding is that the function here is similar to virtio config
>> generation [1]. So this can only happen for a buggy hardware.
> Ok, so this circles back to my original question.
> Should we put a bound on the number of times the loop runs
> or should we accept that the kernel locks up if the HW is buggy?
>

I'm not sure, and similar logic has been used by virtio-pci drivers for 
years. Consider this logic is pretty simple and it should not be the 
only place that virito hardware can lock kernel, we can keep it as is.

Actually, there's no need for hardware to implement generation logic, it 
could be emulated by software or even ignored. In new version of 
virtio-mdev, get_generation() is optional, when it was not implemented, 
0 is simply returned by virtio-mdev transport.

Thanks


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-23 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-16  1:10 [RFC 0/2] Intel IFC VF driver for vdpa Zhu Lingshan
2019-10-16  1:10 ` [RFC 1/2] vhost: IFC VF hardware operation layer Zhu Lingshan
2019-10-16  9:53   ` Simon Horman
2019-10-21  9:55     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2019-10-21 16:31       ` Simon Horman
2019-10-22  1:32         ` Jason Wang
2019-10-22  6:48           ` Zhu Lingshan
2019-10-23 10:13           ` Simon Horman
2019-10-23 10:36             ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-10-23 17:11               ` Simon Horman
2019-10-23 10:36             ` Jason Wang
2019-10-22  1:32         ` Jason Wang
2019-10-16  1:10 ` [RFC 2/2] vhost: IFC VF vdpa layer Zhu Lingshan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-16  1:30 [RFC 0/2] Intel IFC VF driver for vdpa Zhu Lingshan
2019-10-16  1:30 ` [RFC 1/2] vhost: IFC VF hardware operation layer Zhu Lingshan
2019-10-16  8:40   ` Jason Wang
2019-10-21 10:00     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2019-10-21 10:35       ` Jason Wang
2019-10-21 10:35       ` Jason Wang
2019-10-16  8:40   ` Jason Wang
2019-10-16  8:45   ` Jason Wang
2019-10-16  8:45   ` Jason Wang
2019-10-21  9:57     ` Zhu, Lingshan
2019-10-21 10:21       ` Jason Wang
2019-10-21 10:21       ` Jason Wang
2019-10-16  1:03 [RFC 0/2] Intel IFC VF driver for vdpa Zhu Lingshan
2019-10-16  1:03 ` [RFC 1/2] vhost: IFC VF hardware operation layer Zhu Lingshan
2019-10-16  2:04   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-16  2:04   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-16  2:06   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-16  2:06   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-29  7:36     ` Zhu, Lingshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83356b5f-e2f4-ab79-79d7-20d4850c26a9@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.daly@intel.com \
    --cc=jason.zeng@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zhiyuan.lv@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.