From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 65A3DE00D4F; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 01:00:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [213.75.39.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid Received: from cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com (cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com [213.75.39.13]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36355E003E1 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 01:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cpsps-ews29.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.195]) by cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:00:32 +0200 X-Brand: /q/rzKX13g== X-KPN-SpamVerdict: e1=0;e2=0;e3=0;e4=(e1=10;e3=10;e2=11;e4=10);EVW:Whi te;BM:NotScanned;FinalVerdict:Clean X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=aMaOVo1m c=1 sm=1 tr=0 cx=a_idp_e a=ShNidqeCEQB33TAKUUzslw==:117 a=ShNidqeCEQB33TAKUUzslw==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=8SZ6bD3cDFYA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=XobE76Q3jBoA:10 a=7now9POGesoIhv_tDZQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-CM-AcctID: kpn@feedback.cloudmark.com Received: from smtp.kpnmail.nl ([195.121.84.11]) by cpsps-ews29.kpnxchange.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.5.9600.16384); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:00:32 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kpnmail.nl; s=kpnmail01; h=content-type:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:subject; bh=afzBqqCXYKW8NjAROsM4n/w6g67/q5g7tdxdcBbfyrc=; b=K4vFJ3BfgHhaj57x1jXnr6gQp2q+XBNzL8S/4akhxFh2Je05Drgqm4AOGl2s+/ts7KsItpl+FffKr 3Er0kqgUrgI7KchixEkUAEWM3hKneaIA3pRFVCGtnrLtczeJhq26oykQFnrWqaXCAFhQaOQy7L4Msp 6n1bZzJ0expO3FOo= X-Originating-IP: 86.89.1.39 Received: from [192.168.2.198] (unknown [86.89.1.39]) by smtp.kpnmail.nl (Halon) with ESMTP id dc801a44-ef21-11e9-a62b-00505699b758; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:00:32 +0200 (CEST) To: Ross Burton , yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <51d72979-2472-aa84-40cf-7d9e31b05b1c@intel.com> <1683ff49-f5ec-937f-5561-1059a411431e@intel.com> From: pwr@iae.nl Message-ID: <8356f9d1-0d2d-3f87-ccf5-a670a4d28bbb@iae.nl> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:00:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1683ff49-f5ec-937f-5561-1059a411431e@intel.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2019 08:00:32.0529 (UTC) FILETIME=[9E534810:01D5832E] X-RcptDomain: yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: NooB: qemu-native compile error during bitbake core-image-sato X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: pwr@iae.nl List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:00:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-GB On 15-10-2019 00:04, Ross Burton wrote: > On 14/10/2019 22:32, myken wrote: >> For future reference, how could I have found this answer? I searched=20 >> like crazy but never found any reference that qemu is "old" and my=20 >> kernel is "new". > > By recognising where the failure was, knowing that glibc changed, and=20 > that qemu needs to be fixed, then finding the relevant fixes already=20 > existed in qemu. > > Running unsupported distros means discovering stuff like this.=C2=A0 :)= > > Ross Yes I know, that's why I'm asking, thanks. Robert.