From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:12657 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751086AbeAYRgp (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:36:45 -0500 From: "Rapolu, Chiranjeevi" To: Sakari Ailus CC: "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , "tfiga@chromium.org" , "Zheng, Jian Xu" , "Qiu, Tian Shu" , "Yeh, Andy" , "Mani, Rajmohan" , "Yang, Hyungwoo" Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] media: ov13858: Avoid possible null first frame Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:36:44 +0000 Message-ID: <8408A4B5C50F354EA5F62D9FC805153D2C53637E@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1516854879-15029-1-git-send-email-chiranjeevi.rapolu@intel.com> <20180125102958.dxky4qrzv5ags6av@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20180125102958.dxky4qrzv5ags6av@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Sakari, >I'll apply this now, however I see that most of the registers in the four modes are the same. In the future it'd be good to separate the parts that are common in all of them (to be written in sensor power-on) to make this (slightly) more maintainable. Thanks for the review. Makes sense. Not sure how it impacts because the sequence of writes will be different, need thorough testing to confirm nothing is broken.