From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1749667AbXBKPTm (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:19:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750695AbXBKPTm (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:19:42 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:39440 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1749667AbXBKPTl (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:19:41 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=J0rt/jHrmlp4RLJgcwVS95ksq4pG4/3D6JA3Ne87vWpOh+TgiC6JTXvLpGU53KI9+S1tiTClRDsQgshz9D6VQKTc5JUi10SsYUPUo14aTnbjRIDfSw/Tevx695v5A5eouY9uPVyYr/rbLnkm5uFaLSOfKxwdRxcgheuGDvb24Lg= Message-ID: <84144f020702110719i27718657s4c74a4f7217cce6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:19:40 +0200 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? Cc: "Willy Tarreau" , "Matthew Garrett" , "Daniel Barkalow" , nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, "Robert Hancock" , linux-kernel , "Jeff Garzik" , "Pavel Machek" , "pm list" In-Reply-To: <200702111536.20871.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200702111450.49736.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070211135708.GC1868@1wt.eu> <200702111536.20871.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 192f3e786a08af57 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/11/07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Unfortunately it has to be done in one shot for all of the known good drivers to avoid > user-observable regressions. No you don't. You can make it a config option that defaults to n during a transition period. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Pekka Enberg" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:19:40 +0200 Message-ID: <84144f020702110719i27718657s4c74a4f7217cce6@mail.gmail.com> References: <200702111450.49736.rjw@sisk.pl> <20070211135708.GC1868@1wt.eu> <200702111536.20871.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200702111536.20871.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Robert Hancock , Matthew Garrett , Pavel Machek , Jeff Garzik , Daniel Barkalow , pm list , Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 2/11/07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Unfortunately it has to be done in one shot for all of the known good dri= vers to avoid > user-observable regressions. No you don't. You can make it a config option that defaults to n during a transition period.