From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757267AbZDUSZm (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:25:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752786AbZDUSZd (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:25:33 -0400 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.30]:14285 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752665AbZDUSZc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:25:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=naRM6xrO9arV/et5H/SZkVzKpm996q4H5kN/M764B7o8P/Le4ST4c5r6TiJrIsf1p3 LZcaTrwZjgFDqhwprIN5r5xEf+v68cSZ9F28ESKOd/F8qXD/k8FnIvi/dfUJjRN+mQ7m c+reHAdaIW2/SoO0JVNH84SlHF/mjmTkmKUUs= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <49ecf25e2378234eed@agluck-desktop.sc.intel.com> <84144f020904202251n616f188k80c6ce7d974d8b00@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:25:31 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c6658cb7204e3672 Message-ID: <84144f020904211125v68b98df4ke1c04bc29df65fda@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: linux-next ia64 build problems in slqb From: Pekka Enberg To: Christoph Lameter Cc: "Luck, Tony" , Nick Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, randy.dunlap_ocs10g@oracle.com, Andrew Morton , Paul Mundt , iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Luck, Tony wrote: >> > The ia64 "allnoconfig" build ends up with the (possibly dubious) combination >> > of .config options: >> > >> >        CONFIG_SMP=n >> >        CONFIG_NUMA=y >> >> Yeah, I don't think the combination makes much sense and x86 doesn't >> allow it. Can we fix that in ia64 Kconfig? That said, this seems to >> come up with every architecture except x86, so if someone is kind >> enough to send me a tested fix for slqb, I'll just go ahead and apply >> it. On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Tony runs tests with this configuration. This is an established > configuration and has been historically supported. Interesting. What exactly is an UP NUMA machine? Anyway, I'm more than happy to apply a tested patch to fix up SLQB. Nick?