From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22AF7AF0 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 05:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A3D7D2 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 05:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x785I76d011669 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 01:25:01 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2u89gq7vtj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 01:25:01 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:25:00 +0100 From: Andrew Donnellan To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mark Brown References: <7b73e1b7-cc34-982d-2a9c-acf62b88da16@linuxfoundation.org> <20190628205102.GA3131@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <20190629112055.GB2793@sirena.org.uk> <20190630130154.1b5cf991@coco.lan> <7d2e5632-819d-f5dd-072e-13d8b4e34abb@linux.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:24:48 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7d2e5632-819d-f5dd-072e-13d8b4e34abb@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-AU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <84339269-1575-83a0-87d1-1a9ee7e55f53@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "'patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org'" , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Patch version changes in commit logs? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 1/7/19 11:35 am, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 1/7/19 2:01 am, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Em Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:20:55 +0100 >> Mark Brown escreveu: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 09:18:28AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: >>> >>>> BTW, can the URL be reached from patchwork?  That'd be really handy. >>> >>> Even better, could patchwork add it to the mboxes you download from it >>> like acks and so on?  Currently you can get the message ID so it's easy >>> to construct the link for things that are on LKML. >> >> I'm all for it, but the problem with patchwork is that the tool may be >> used >> on non-kernel development and/or the ML may not be in lore. >> >> Also, there are more than one patchwork instance. We use our own for >> Linux media (https://patchwork.linuxtv.org)[1]. >> >> On media, patchwork is used for both Kernel development and VDR >> development (an userspace tool) - with is a completely unrelated >> project (with different people behind it - and even a different mailing >> list). >> >> So, whatever change at patchwork should be done in a way that the >> ML URL could be customized, and the new field would be added only >> if the URL is not blank. > > [+ patchwork list] > > I'll have a go at adding a project/list-specific archive prefix and > exposing that in the web interface. I've now submitted patches to add a mailing list archive link for each patch visible via the web interface and also via the REST API. > Regarding adding it to downloaded mboxes, if we do that I'd like it to > be a separate option. A single patch can also land in patchwork multiple > times via various lists, so the URL will depend on which project you're > looking at. Haven't done this bit yet. -- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited