From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752304AbdFRKLr (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2017 06:11:47 -0400 Received: from b.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.144]:44723 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750898AbdFRKLp (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2017 06:11:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: block2mtd: Add support for specifying MTD write size and subpage shift To: Pavel Machek Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=c3=a1r?= , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Boris Brezillon , Marek Vasut , Artem Bityutskiy , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1496418222-23483-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <1496418222-23483-3-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20170605112145.GE14675@pali> <20170605112508.GF14675@pali> <79f3b92f-5be4-8d46-985d-0b38cffd6032@nod.at> <20170618100626.GC20211@amd> From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <8440a46a-0ba2-b00f-e55b-d0a0fa9b8aa6@nod.at> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 12:11:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170618100626.GC20211@amd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel, Am 18.06.2017 um 12:06 schrieb Pavel Machek: > Hi! > >>>>>> Am 02.06.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Pali Rohár: >>>>>>> It is needed for creating emulated devices suitable for using in UBI layer >>>>>>> and with UBIFS. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? >>>>> >>>>> ubifs depends on write size of nand. And without those parameters as >>>>> specified in cover letter I'm unable to mount N900 rootfs image exported >>>>> via block2mtd. ubifs reject such image. >>>> >>>> Hmm, so you render block2mtd into a semi-NAND chip? :) >>> >>> Probably you can call it like that. But it is still MTD device... >> >> This is what I meant in my other mail. >> You add NAND specific properties but still denote it as MTD_RAM/ROM. >> I'm not sure whether this is a good idea. > > Can you suggest any other way for Pali to mount rootfs image on his > PC? Are you my micro manager? ;-) As stated in my other mail, we have nandsim and there is work going on to allow specifying arbitrary NAND sizes. An alternative approach can be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/12/296 Thanks, //richard