All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Alex Elder' <elder@linaro.org>,
	"subashab@codeaurora.org" <subashab@codeaurora.org>,
	"stranche@codeaurora.org" <stranche@codeaurora.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "sharathv@codeaurora.org" <sharathv@codeaurora.org>,
	"bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	"evgreen@chromium.org" <evgreen@chromium.org>,
	"cpratapa@codeaurora.org" <cpratapa@codeaurora.org>,
	"elder@kernel.org" <elder@kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel test robot" <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] net: qualcomm: rmnet: don't use C bit-fields in rmnet checksum header
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:10:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8452678da3a647249780b60e857bb32a@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc8e3bb0-81f0-070b-5b70-342dc172a1a2@linaro.org>

...
> Sort of related, I have been meaning to eliminate the
> pointless __aligned(1) tags on rmnet structures defined
> in <linux/if_rmnet.h>.  It wouldn't hurt to use __packed,
> though I think they're all 4 or 8 bytes naturally anyway.
> Perhaps marking them __aligned(4) would help identify
> potential unaligned accesses?

Don't use __packed (etc) unless the data might be misaligned.
If the architecture doesn't support misaligned memory
accesses then the compiler has to generate code that
does byte accesses and shifts.

__aligned(4) is mostly useful for structures that have
to have an 8-byte field on a 4-byte boundary.
(As happens in the x86 compat32 code.)

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-08 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-06  3:15 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] net: qualcomm: rmnet: stop using C bit-fields Alex Elder
2021-03-06  3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] net: qualcomm: rmnet: mark trailer field endianness Alex Elder
2021-03-06  3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: qualcomm: rmnet: simplify some byte order logic Alex Elder
2021-03-06  3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: qualcomm: rmnet: kill RMNET_MAP_GET_*() accessor macros Alex Elder
2021-03-06  3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] net: qualcomm: rmnet: use field masks instead of C bit-fields Alex Elder
2021-03-06  3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: qualcomm: rmnet: don't use C bit-fields in rmnet checksum trailer Alex Elder
2021-03-08 10:13   ` David Laight
2021-03-08 13:39     ` Alex Elder
2021-03-08 13:53       ` David Laight
2021-03-08 14:19         ` Alex Elder
2021-03-06  3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] net: qualcomm: rmnet: don't use C bit-fields in rmnet checksum header Alex Elder
2021-03-08 10:18   ` David Laight
2021-03-08 13:59     ` Alex Elder
2021-03-08 14:10       ` David Laight [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8452678da3a647249780b60e857bb32a@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=cpratapa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sharathv@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=stranche@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.