From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932982Ab0LTSxk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:53:40 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:44266 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757292Ab0LTSxj (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:53:39 -0500 Message-Id: <849307$arcbdv@azsmga001.ch.intel.com> X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,203,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="364260799" Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:53:35 +0000 To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [BISECTED] agp/intel: revert "Remove confusion of stolen entries not stolen memory" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie In-Reply-To: <201012201912.19051.arnd@arndb.de> References: <201012201912.19051.arnd@arndb.de> From: Chris Wilson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:12:19 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Commit c64f7ba5f10 "agp/intel: Remove confusion of stolen entries not stolen memory" caused a regression on my Intel G45 based system, using the VESA > Xorg driver or uvesafb. I have not tried if i915 with KMS shows the same > behaviour, but can try if necessary. I'm very confused as to how this would have impacted the VESA video driver. Any clues as to what VESA is doing? And what is the nature of the regression? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre