From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Kurth Subject: Archiving Xen on ARM and PVOPS subprojects Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:23:11 +0100 Message-ID: <8499DCF7-067C-40FD-AB48-586D8F49254B@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5168888430701604439==" Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini Cc: Sarah Conway List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============5168888430701604439== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_173CEEFF-30DF-47AB-B570-F871235EE114" --Apple-Mail=_173CEEFF-30DF-47AB-B570-F871235EE114 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi all, I wanted to make the proposal to archive the following two subproject on = the grounds that they completed their goals a) http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/pvops.html = b) http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/arm-hypervisor.html = In the case of a) the goal was to establish Xen support in Linux, which = has been achieved In the case of b) the goal was to establish ARM support in the = Hypervisor which has been achieved According to http://xenproject.org/governance.html = we would need to perform an = archivation review. In this case, the situation is quite clear IMHO and = I believe that we do not need to make an extensive case, besides the one = above. So my proposal would be to just have a committer vote on these. I = would be happy if committers and maintainers listed in a), b) and = http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/hypervisor.html = were to just = reply with the usual +1, 0, -1 to this thread. In practical terms, the following would happen. I would remove a) from = the website and merge bits of b) into = http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/hypervisor.html = There is no mailing list or repo impact for both projects, as both do = not have separate lists. We would probably archive some pages in = http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Category:PVOPS = - I would need David = and Konrad's help for that. Probably 15 minutes should be fine. Maybe in = fact it may make sense to rename the Category to Linux. As far as I can see, none of the pages in = http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Category:XenARM = need to be archived. = http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Archived/Xen_ARM_(PV) = is already = archived. We would probably also put together a blog post, once all of this has = been done and maybe put together a press release (up to Sarah and the = Advisory Board). Any views? Best Regards Lars --Apple-Mail=_173CEEFF-30DF-47AB-B570-F871235EE114 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Hi all,

I = wanted to make the proposal to archive the following two subproject on = the grounds that they completed their goals

b) http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/arm-hypervisor.html<= /div>

In the case of = a) the goal was to establish Xen support in Linux, which has been = achieved
In the case of b) the goal was to = establish ARM support in the Hypervisor which has been = achieved

According to http://xenproject.org/governance.html we would need = to perform an archivation review. In this case, the situation is quite = clear IMHO and I believe that we do not need to make an extensive case, = besides the one above. So my proposal would be to just have a committer = vote on these. I would be happy if committers and maintainers listed in = a), b) and http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/hypervisor.html = ;were to just reply with the usual +1, 0, -1 to this thread.

In practical terms, the = following would happen. I would remove a) from the website and merge = bits of b) into http://xenproject.org/developers/teams/hypervisor.html

There is no = mailing list or repo impact for both projects, as both do not have = separate lists.

We would probably archive some pages in http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Category:PVOPS - I = would need David and Konrad's help for that. Probably 15 minutes should = be fine. Maybe in fact it may make sense to rename the Category to = Linux.

As far = as I can see, none of the pages in http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Category:XenARM need = to be archived. http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Archived/Xen_ARM_(PV) = is already archived.

We would probably also put together a blog post, once all of = this has been done and maybe put together a press release (up to Sarah = and the Advisory Board).

Any views?

Best Regards
Lars


= --Apple-Mail=_173CEEFF-30DF-47AB-B570-F871235EE114-- --===============5168888430701604439== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============5168888430701604439==--