All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, lina.iyer@linaro.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V3 3/7] PM / QOS: Keep common notifier list for genpd constraints
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:36:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <851a8ddd4b30e632f2491fc034c62a0b0ebcccfa.1487926924.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1487926924.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1487926924.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Only the resume_latency constraint uses the notifiers right now. In
order to prepare for adding new constraint types with notifiers, move to
a common notifier list.

Update pm_qos_update_target() to pass a pointer to the constraint
structure to the notifier callbacks. Also update the notifier callbacks
as well to error out for unexpected constraints.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/base/power/domain.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 drivers/base/power/qos.c    | 15 ++++-----------
 include/linux/pm_qos.h      |  7 +++++++
 kernel/power/qos.c          |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
index e697dec9d25b..303490ab5ffd 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
@@ -416,14 +416,10 @@ static int genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, unsigned int depth)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int genpd_dev_pm_qos_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
-				     unsigned long val, void *ptr)
+static int __resume_latency_notifier(struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data,
+				     unsigned long val)
 {
-	struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
-	struct device *dev;
-
-	gpd_data = container_of(nb, struct generic_pm_domain_data, nb);
-	dev = gpd_data->base.dev;
+	struct device *dev = gpd_data->base.dev;
 
 	for (;;) {
 		struct generic_pm_domain *genpd;
@@ -456,6 +452,22 @@ static int genpd_dev_pm_qos_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
 	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
+static int genpd_dev_pm_qos_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+				     unsigned long val, void *ptr)
+{
+	struct generic_pm_domain_data *gpd_data;
+	struct device *dev;
+
+	gpd_data = container_of(nb, struct generic_pm_domain_data, nb);
+	dev = gpd_data->base.dev;
+
+	if (dev_pm_qos_notifier_is_resume_latency(dev, ptr))
+		return __resume_latency_notifier(gpd_data, val);
+
+	dev_err(dev, "%s: Unexpected notifier call\n", __func__);
+	return NOTIFY_BAD;
+}
+
 /**
  * genpd_power_off_work_fn - Power off PM domain whose subdomain count is 0.
  * @work: Work structure used for scheduling the execution of this function.
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
index 271bec73185e..851fff60319c 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
@@ -173,18 +173,12 @@ static int dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct dev_pm_qos *qos;
 	struct pm_qos_constraints *c;
-	struct blocking_notifier_head *n;
 
 	qos = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!qos)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	n = kzalloc(sizeof(*n), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!n) {
-		kfree(qos);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
-	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(n);
+	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&qos->notifiers);
 
 	c = &qos->resume_latency;
 	plist_head_init(&c->list);
@@ -192,7 +186,7 @@ static int dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev)
 	c->default_value = PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_DEFAULT_VALUE;
 	c->no_constraint_value = PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_DEFAULT_VALUE;
 	c->type = PM_QOS_MIN;
-	c->notifiers = n;
+	c->notifiers = &qos->notifiers;
 
 	c = &qos->latency_tolerance;
 	plist_head_init(&c->list);
@@ -269,7 +263,6 @@ void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev)
 	dev->power.qos = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
 
-	kfree(qos->resume_latency.notifiers);
 	kfree(qos);
 
  out:
@@ -488,7 +481,7 @@ int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *notifier)
 		ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev);
 
 	if (!ret)
-		ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(dev->power.qos->resume_latency.notifiers,
+		ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&dev->power.qos->notifiers,
 						       notifier);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
@@ -515,7 +508,7 @@ int dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(struct device *dev,
 
 	/* Silently return if the constraints object is not present. */
 	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->power.qos))
-		retval = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(dev->power.qos->resume_latency.notifiers,
+		retval = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&dev->power.qos->notifiers,
 							    notifier);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
index 3e2547d6e207..dd02020a02b6 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct dev_pm_qos {
 	struct dev_pm_qos_request *resume_latency_req;
 	struct dev_pm_qos_request *latency_tolerance_req;
 	struct dev_pm_qos_request *flags_req;
+	struct blocking_notifier_head notifiers; /* common for all constraints */
 };
 
 /* Action requested to pm_qos_update_target */
@@ -114,6 +115,12 @@ static inline int dev_pm_qos_request_active(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req)
 	return req->dev != NULL;
 }
 
+static inline bool dev_pm_qos_notifier_is_resume_latency(struct device *dev,
+		struct pm_qos_constraints *c)
+{
+	return &dev->power.qos->resume_latency == c;
+}
+
 int pm_qos_update_target(struct pm_qos_constraints *c, struct plist_node *node,
 			 enum pm_qos_req_action action, int value);
 bool pm_qos_update_flags(struct pm_qos_flags *pqf,
diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
index 97b0df71303e..073324e0c3c8 100644
--- a/kernel/power/qos.c
+++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ int pm_qos_update_target(struct pm_qos_constraints *c, struct plist_node *node,
 		if (c->notifiers)
 			blocking_notifier_call_chain(c->notifiers,
 						     (unsigned long)curr_value,
-						     NULL);
+						     c);
 	} else {
 		ret = 0;
 	}
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-24  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-24  9:06 [PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Viresh Kumar
2017-02-24  9:06 ` [PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states" binding Viresh Kumar
2017-02-24  9:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-02-28  0:31   ` Rob Herring
2017-02-28  0:31     ` Rob Herring
2017-02-28  5:36     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-02-28  5:36       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-02-24  9:06 ` [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes Viresh Kumar
2017-02-24  9:06   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-02-28  0:39   ` Rob Herring
2017-02-28  0:39     ` Rob Herring
2017-02-28  6:57     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-02-28  6:57       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-02-28 14:10       ` Rob Herring
2017-02-28 14:10         ` Rob Herring
2017-02-28 15:14         ` Ulf Hansson
2017-02-28 15:14           ` Ulf Hansson
2017-02-28 15:52           ` Rob Herring
2017-02-28 15:52             ` Rob Herring
2017-02-28 19:13             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-01  6:14             ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-01  8:45               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-01  8:54                 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-01  6:27             ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-03-01 23:13               ` Rob Herring
2017-03-02  3:30                 ` Rajendra Nayak
2017-03-01  6:12         ` Viresh Kumar
2017-02-24  9:06 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2017-02-24  9:06 ` [PATCH V3 4/7] PM / QOS: Add DEV_PM_QOS_PERFORMANCE request Viresh Kumar
2017-02-24  9:06 ` [PATCH V3 5/7] PM / domain: Register for PM QOS performance notifier Viresh Kumar
2017-02-24  9:06 ` [PATCH V3 6/7] PM / Domains: Allow domain performance states to be read from DT Viresh Kumar
2017-02-24  9:06 ` [PATCH V3 7/7] PM / OPP: Add support to parse domain-performance-state Viresh Kumar
2017-03-10 20:38 ` [PATCH V3 0/7] PM / Domains: Implement domain performance states Kevin Hilman
2017-03-13 10:39   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-15 10:49     ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=851a8ddd4b30e632f2491fc034c62a0b0ebcccfa.1487926924.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.