From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roman Mashak Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix IFE meta modules loading Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:37:39 -0400 Message-ID: <85lgkgw19o.fsf@mojatatu.com> References: <1507733430-17860-1-git-send-email-mrv@mojatatu.com> <20171012.122318.1151617277989957064.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:48271 "EHLO mail-it0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752756AbdJLUho (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:37:44 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c3so8829756itc.3 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 13:37:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171012.122318.1151617277989957064.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:23:18 -0700 (PDT)") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller writes: > From: Roman Mashak > Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:50:28 -0400 > >> Adjust module alias names of IFE meta modules and fix the bug that >> prevented auto-loading IFE modules in run-time. > > Anyone using the existing alises will be broken by these changes > no? Actually aliases never worked, the bug existed since the day act_meta_* modules have been introduced. I suspect everyone compiles them in-kernel rather then as modules. > Is it possible to define multiple aliases? That would be a way to > get the more desirable names whilst not breaking existing users.