From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:52:16 +0100 Message-ID: <85oddgva33.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <7vabpctx3b.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vve7tuz3a.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071123103003.GB6754@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20071124113814.GA17861@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vtznbqx2w.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071125215128.GC23820@fieldses.org> <20071126041521.GA21120@fieldses.org> <85lk8k24ju.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85hcj8zqfm.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85sl2sya55.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85bq9gy5e0.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 27 00:52:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IwnkV-0007jH-HU for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:52:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756452AbXKZXwE (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:52:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756312AbXKZXwE (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:52:04 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:42959 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756069AbXKZXwB (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:52:01 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iwnk8-0001DO-M6; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:52:00 -0500 Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id BE9631C4D3AA; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:52:16 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:28:43 -0500 (EST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nicolas Pitre writes: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, David Kastrup wrote: > >> On the other hand: why bother participating in a community that turns >> openly hostile whenever one experiences problems? Where is the fun in >> that? That one will at one point of time be in the situation to lambast >> others for their shortcomings, and feel that one is entirely in-style >> doing so here? > > David, honestly, my problem with you is that you seem to be the only one > having such relational problems around here, I am the only one? I quote from your reply to my original contribution in this thread: >On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Nicolas Pitre writes: >> >> > [ I get really really annoyed when your replies to me aren't directly >> > addressed to me, Jakub. Told you so repeatedly in the past as well. >> > Why are you the only one on this list apparently not able to use a >> > proper email setup? ] >> >> X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ >> >> And Jakub by far is not the only one using gmane for reading and writing >> to the list. > >It is strange, though, that Jakub is the only one I've noticed who isn't >able to do me the courtesy of addressing me directly when replying to >me. So here you are telling Jakub off as discourteous and the "only one on this list apparently not able to use a proper email setup". And when I explain that I have been in the same situation with a different account of mine and that this has nothing to do with discourtesy, the heat turns over to me. And, again, this is declared an absolutely isolated phenomenon restricted to a single person. I am afraid that I am too stupid to understand what goal is supposed to be achieved by this sort of behavior. I don't see anything except annoyance for everybody involved. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum