From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] examples: fix ip_reassembly not work with
	some NICs
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:57:12 +0000
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E6312D6AD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1485156509-4919-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com>
 <20180827132023.6566-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>, "Yigit, Ferruh"
 <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@gmail.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E1F4CA7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:57:16 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20180827132023.6566-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Boccassi,
Packet type is supported in both vector and normal Rx functions of Fortvill=
e pmd. So I think this patch was superseded because of it do not fix the re=
al issue.

Thanks,
Marvin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:luca.boccassi@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 9:20 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; thomas@monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] examples: fix ip_reassembly not work with some NI=
Cs
>=20
> Hi Thomas and Yong,
>=20
> This patch:
>=20
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/19868/
>=20
> Fixes an error in the Intel regression tests when backported to the
> 16.11.x LTS branch, but was never committed to master.
> It's marked as superseded, and the error does not appear on master.
>=20
> Do you remember what other change superseded this patch? I can't
> find anything on the mailing list.
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> Kind regards,
> Luca Boccassi