From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3166207EC for ; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 01:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759495AbcIXBEy (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:04:54 -0400 Received: from avasout03.plus.net ([84.93.230.244]:39700 "EHLO avasout03.plus.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757363AbcIXBEw (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:04:52 -0400 Received: from [10.0.2.15] ([194.75.29.46]) by avasout03 with smtp id nD4m1t0030zhorE01D4nxe; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 02:04:48 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=YLLd8lOx c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=g54qAj+LxVGqXy9pVcJ+0w==:117 a=g54qAj+LxVGqXy9pVcJ+0w==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=PQoDFM0dOL4fuh_YDxsA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=6kGIvZw6iX1k4Y-7sg4_:22 X-AUTH: ramsayjones@:2500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] run-command: async_exit no longer needs to be public To: Junio C Hamano , Lars Schneider References: <78f2bdd0-f6ad-db5c-f9f2-f90528bc4f77@ramsayjones.plus.com> <58164A5E-AC93-48A9-9139-B69CFB854CA8@gmail.com> <6DE6D03D-F496-4FAB-866A-BC6802312B43@gmail.com> Cc: Jeff King , GIT Mailing-list From: Ramsay Jones Message-ID: <866eac55-92cb-d034-3ba8-faa84d8c8a03@ramsayjones.plus.com> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 02:04:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 23/09/16 20:26, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Lars Schneider writes: > >>> I do not offhand know if the topic is otherwise ready as-is, or >>> needs further work. When you need to reroll, you'd also need to >>> fetch from the result of the above from me first and then start your >>> work from it, though, if we go that route. >> >> Sounds good to me! > > OK, here is what I queued, then. This looks good to me. Thanks! ATB, Ramsay Jones