From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Subject: Re: Git.pm Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 09:56:44 -0700 Message-ID: <86likyy7ub.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <20120426203136.GA15432@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Tim Henigan , git To: Subho Banerjee X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 11 18:56:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SSt9E-0003hu-G1 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:56:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760559Ab2EKQ4v (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2012 12:56:51 -0400 Received: from lax-gw16.mailroute.net ([199.89.0.116]:58840 "EHLO gw16.lax01.mailroute.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753950Ab2EKQ4u (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2012 12:56:50 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gw16.lax01.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4635BC4D7; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:56:46 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from gw16.lax01.mailroute.net ([199.89.0.116]) by localhost (gw16.lax01.mailroute.net.mailroute.net [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10026) with LMTP id ZCEjxV5mxG-k; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:56:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [208.79.95.2]) by gw16.lax01.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068D25BC4A4; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:56:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E85E7270B; Fri, 11 May 2012 09:56:44 -0700 (PDT) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.19.6.16; tzolkin = 1 Cib; haab = 19 Uo In-Reply-To: (Subho Banerjee's message of "Thu, 10 May 2012 18:49:36 +0530") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >>>>> "Subho" == Subho Banerjee writes: Subho> I have started looking into how the error catching mechanism Subho> implemented right now. I have looked into the more modern error Subho> catching/throwing mechanisms in use in perl, and I am of the opinion Subho> that Try::Simple would probably be the best candidate for being the Subho> new error catching mechanism. I also wanted to discuss some aspects of Subho> the changes to be made - Try::Tiny is preferred to Try::Simple. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion