From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hong zhang <henryzhang62@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 22:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Linksys WPC300N Wireless-N Notebook Adapter
Message-ID: <870837.90367.qm@web57905.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org


Luis,

Have you experience XJperf (windows graphic version iperf) to measure UDP/TCP throughput? I think it does not work properly because UDP throughput is always 1Mbites/s.

Also, does "iw dev ath0 station dump" display bit rate (I have not tested my WPC300N yet)?

---henry

--- On Sat, 5/16/09, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Linksys WPC300N Wireless-N Notebook Adapter
> To: "hong zhang" <henryzhang62@yahoo.com>
> Cc: ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org
> Date: Saturday, May 16, 2009, 11:06 PM
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 8:10 PM, hong
> zhang <henryzhang62@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > List,
> >
> > I just bought a Linksys WPC300N Wireless-N Notebook
> Adapter.
> >
> > 1. How many anntanas does this card ?have?
> 
> Should have 2.
> 
> > 2. Should TCP throughput from AP to this card and this
> card to AP be same
> > ? if I use iperf to measure TCP throughput?
> 
> That's the goal, although I think we achieve this better in
> current
> wireless-testing (what you will see in 2.6.31). If you want
> to use the
> above MCS rates you want to use wireless-testing for now.
> If you don't
> mind ~ MCS 11 2.6.30 will do.
> 
> http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Documentation/ieee80211/802.11n
> 
> ? Luis
>