Re: [PATCH] migration: Don't return for postcopy_send_discard_bm_ram()

[Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>]

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> postcopy_send_discard_bm_ram() always return zero. Since it can't
> fail, simplify and do not return anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> Based-on: <20211224065000.97572-1-peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/ram.c | 6 +-----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 5234d1ece11..e241ce98461 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -2433,14 +2433,12 @@ void ram_postcopy_migrated_memory_release(MigrationState *ms)
>  /**
>   * postcopy_send_discard_bm_ram: discard a RAMBlock
>   *
> - * Returns zero on success
> - *
>   * Callback from postcopy_each_ram_send_discard for each RAMBlock
>   *
>   * @ms: current migration state
>   * @block: RAMBlock to discard
>   */
> -static int postcopy_send_discard_bm_ram(MigrationState *ms, RAMBlock *block)
> +static void postcopy_send_discard_bm_ram(MigrationState *ms, RAMBlock *block)
>  {
>      unsigned long end = block->used_length >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
>      unsigned long current;
> @@ -2464,8 +2462,6 @@ static int postcopy_send_discard_bm_ram(MigrationState *ms, RAMBlock *block)
>          postcopy_discard_send_range(ms, one, discard_length);
>          current = one + discard_length;
>      }
> -
> -    return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void postcopy_chunk_hostpages_pass(MigrationState *ms, RAMBlock *block);

Nack.

You need to change the only caller (postcopy_each_send_discard) also.

        ret = postcopy_send_discard_bm_ram(ms, block);
        postcopy_discard_send_finish(ms);
        if (ret) {
            return ret;
        }

Not sure if doing the same operation with
postcopy_each_send_discard/ram_postcopy_send_discard_bitmap() and
postcopy_chunk_hugepages makes sense.

Later, Juan.