From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDBL2-00035U-9z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 11:03:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDBKz-0008Bf-ON for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 11:03:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDBKz-00089Y-J7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 May 2017 11:03:05 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5111E6267F for ; Tue, 23 May 2017 15:03:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Markus Armbruster References: <1494327362-30727-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <87vaorbyj9.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <730a6123-61cc-39f2-b62e-0bac48babf80@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 17:03:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <730a6123-61cc-39f2-b62e-0bac48babf80@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Tue, 23 May 2017 16:52:32 +0200") Message-ID: <871srfzkd5.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] scsi: Minor cleanups around scsi-disk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 23/05/2017 13:30, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Paolo Bonzini writes: >> >>> On 09/05/2017 12:56, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>>> Markus Armbruster (2): >>>> block: Clarify documentation of BlockInfo member io-status >>>> virtio-scsi-test: Use scsi-hd instead of legacy scsi-disk >>>> >>>> qapi/block-core.json | 3 ++- >>>> tests/virtio-scsi-test.c | 2 +- >>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>> >>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini >> >> Thanks! >> >> The canonical path is through your tree, but I could stick it into a >> miscellaneous pull request if you like. > > I saw you posted these two together so I wasn't sure who would do that. > :) These are not files that my pull requests touch a lot. I assume that means I should post the pull request myself. Holler if I'm wrong.