All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf evsel: fix NULL pointer deference when evsel->counts is NULL
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:53:21 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871udfkua5.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1358613414-13005-1-git-send-email-colin.king@canonical.com

Hi Colin,

On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:36:54 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> __perf_evsel__read_on_cpu() only bails out with -ENOMEM if
> evsel->counts is NULL and perf_evsel__alloc_counts() has returned
> an error.  If perf_evsel__alloc_counts() does not return an error
> we get an NULL pointer deference on evsel->counts->cpu[cpu]
> if evsel->counts is NULL.

perf_evsel__alloc_counts() should allocate evsel->counts when it sees
evsel->counts is NULL and return negative error code if the allocation
fails.

So I don't see any problem in current code.  With your code, it won't
try to allocate if ->counts is NULL but overwrite existing ->counts?

Thanks,
Namhyung

>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 1b16dd1..93acd06 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ int __perf_evsel__read_on_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>  	if (FD(evsel, cpu, thread) < 0)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (evsel->counts == NULL && perf_evsel__alloc_counts(evsel, cpu + 1) < 0)
> +	if (evsel->counts == NULL || perf_evsel__alloc_counts(evsel, cpu + 1) < 0)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	if (readn(FD(evsel, cpu, thread), &count, nv * sizeof(u64)) < 0)

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-21  4:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-19 16:36 [PATCH] perf evsel: fix NULL pointer deference when evsel->counts is NULL Colin King
2013-01-21  4:53 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-01-23 22:02   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-01-23 23:26     ` Colin Ian King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871udfkua5.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.