From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754146Ab0CXCPQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:15:16 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:40028 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754064Ab0CXCPO (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:15:14 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , Anton Starikov , Greg KH , stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance From: Andi Kleen References: <20100323102208.512c16cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100323173409.GA24845@elte.hu> <9D040E9A-80F2-468F-A6CD-A4912615CD3F@gmail.com> <9FC34DA1-D6DD-41E5-8B76-0712A813C549@gmail.com> <20100323233640.GA16798@elte.hu> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:15:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:55:42 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <871vfah3db.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> We havent had any stability problems with them, except one trivial build bug, >> so -stable would be nice. > > Oh, you're right. There was that UML build bug. But I think that was > included in the list of commits Anton had - commit 4126faf0ab ("x86: Fix > breakage of UML from the changes in the rwsem system"). It would be also nice to get that change into 2.6.32 stable. That is widely used on larger systems. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994A36B01B1 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:15:19 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance From: Andi Kleen References: <20100323102208.512c16cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100323173409.GA24845@elte.hu> <9D040E9A-80F2-468F-A6CD-A4912615CD3F@gmail.com> <9FC34DA1-D6DD-41E5-8B76-0712A813C549@gmail.com> <20100323233640.GA16798@elte.hu> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:15:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:55:42 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <871vfah3db.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ingo Molnar , Anton Starikov , Greg KH , stable@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra List-ID: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >> We havent had any stability problems with them, except one trivial build bug, >> so -stable would be nice. > > Oh, you're right. There was that UML build bug. But I think that was > included in the list of commits Anton had - commit 4126faf0ab ("x86: Fix > breakage of UML from the changes in the rwsem system"). It would be also nice to get that change into 2.6.32 stable. That is widely used on larger systems. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org