From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752862AbbKBUg6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:36:58 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50968 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752389AbbKBUgz (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:36:55 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20151102132901.157178466@infradead.org> <20151102134941.005198372@infradead.org> To: Linus Torvalds Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Oleg Nesterov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul McKenney , boqun.feng@gmail.com, Jonathan Corbet , Michal Hocko , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] locking: Introduce smp_cond_acquire() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8721.1446496609.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 20:36:49 +0000 Message-ID: <8722.1446496609@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > + smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* ctrl */ \ > > + smp_rmb(); /* ctrl + rmb := acquire */ \ Doesn't smp_rmb() imply an smp_read_barrier_depends() anyway? In memory-barriers.txt, it says: Read memory barriers imply data dependency barriers, and so can substitute for them. David