From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] s390x: ipl: Consolidate iplb validity check into one function
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:20:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8727a184-771c-0a87-7faf-fa035c7d9e5e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95756870-e2dc-bd93-5804-b542f665a83d@de.ibm.com>
On 10.03.20 10:11, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 10.03.20 10:09, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> It's nicer to just call one function than calling a function for each
>> possible iplb type.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
> David, still ok? If yes I will pick this one.
Sure, only missed the duplicate check. thanks
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 11:21 [PATCH v7 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:21 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] Sync pv Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:21 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 13:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 14:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09 14:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-10 9:27 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09 15:42 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 15:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-10 8:32 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] s390x: ipl: Consolidate iplb validity check into one function Janosch Frank
2020-03-10 8:32 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2020-03-10 9:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-10 9:23 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-10 9:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-10 9:24 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-10 8:40 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] s390x: ipl: Consolidate iplb validity check into one function David Hildenbrand
2020-03-10 9:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-10 9:09 ` [PATCH v8] " Janosch Frank
2020-03-10 9:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-10 9:20 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-03-10 9:21 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-03-09 14:28 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Viktor Mihajlovski
2020-03-09 14:46 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:21 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 13:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 13:51 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 14:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 11:21 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] s390x: protvirt: Inhibit balloon when switching to protected mode Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 13:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 14:00 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:21 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:21 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:21 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:21 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 15:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 16:05 ` Janosch Frank
2020-03-10 8:42 ` [PATCH v8] " Janosch Frank
2020-03-10 9:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 11:22 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:22 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDA Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:22 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:22 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:22 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:22 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] docs: Add protvirt docs Janosch Frank
2020-03-09 11:22 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1 Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8727a184-771c-0a87-7faf-fa035c7d9e5e@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.