From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6C8C433F5 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1389832AbiDUPFj (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 11:05:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42472 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229537AbiDUPFg (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2022 11:05:36 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7816457B8; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:02:46 -0700 (PDT) From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1650553364; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SlFeoiiTAY6F1YgbT9Fkea5gk5jIaS/6AwlUauJpEpM=; b=GGJt0avUVw2F6use+61ZSkdT9PwiDiR4S7AL1HDJCb3Hy9cjATAzLUVnHOBgBFPkhUVUFb Clb0if52J/E/Guh7O5wHvWt96J6BP7mz4n+jdHMm3H1FpRibxIQyjYdiSD1MOEt2AdF7Ja 6SVRTY0O/tVCIw6BaGQW+NG6WZtIVrnjw6f0EYCejRZDITPrrnsifoMRm3ooY9xzZXg7M0 kIuFBBPiZzmlVN+SCfad3CaF5qW7bahFUXyY2bdmQGG/GLAjroKUbCUXtpIQHqNvs99cLo DJJaLW/TtjqXOzHXfwXAklkBqUHl97FyUjfRfJpuI5X/WlkOvTH3U6g+hSxaMA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1650553364; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SlFeoiiTAY6F1YgbT9Fkea5gk5jIaS/6AwlUauJpEpM=; b=2NwaGsnWKw7FDPW9XKI+2/QUv7wPuJqR4fxhslzGs7ci87MHpwQX68EflthVOqDXGKNmx4 PrwTu47nW10zyTDw== To: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Alexander Potapenko , Stephen Boyd , Randy Dunlap , Nicholas Piggin , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , "Paul E. McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay , Josh Triplett , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Joel Fernandes , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Helge Deller , Andy Shevchenko , Peter Zijlstra , Xiaoming Ni , Marco Elver , Wei Liu , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Daniel Lezcano , Mark Brown , Shawn Guo , Dmitry Torokhov , "Eric W. Biederman" , Matti Vaittinen , Wang Qing , rcu@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v3 00/15] printk/for-next In-Reply-To: <20220421144025.GE11747@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20220419234637.357112-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de> <20220421144025.GE11747@pathway.suse.cz> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 17:08:43 +0206 Message-ID: <8735i6h430.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022-04-21, Petr Mladek wrote: > This series looks almost ready for linux-next. The only real > problems are: > > + Use allow_direct_printing() instead of > atomic_read(&printk_prefer_direct) in defer_console_output() > > + "temporary" remove > console_lock_single_hold()/console_lock_single_release() and > use the full console_lock()/console_unlock() instead. > > The rest are few cosmetic issues. > > I would like to push this into linux-next ASAP so that we get some > wider testing of this approach. I do not expect that we could find > much more issues just by staring into the code ;-) > > Now, the question is whether I should wait for v4. Or whether > I should put v3 into linux-next with a follow up patch doing > the two above suggested changes. They are quite trivial. > > Anyway, if I pushed v3+fixup then I would replace it with v4, v5, ... > once they are available. I just do not want to block testing because > of cosmetic problems. Even though the fixup may be straight-forward, it would be touching a lot of lines and could potentially introduce new problems. I prefer you wait for a v4 so that there is no mess to clean up. I can post a v4 tomorrow (using option #1 from [0] as the synchronization alternative). John [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/875yn2h5ku.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de