From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE66C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A94B23A22 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731743AbgLHXZv (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:25:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38582 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725906AbgLHXZu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:25:50 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3C0C0613D6; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:25:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id s21so121894pfu.13; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:25:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=XFoNwmiRWpNpmOeN4HBz6edK6SX4pgenNv89iRzJA+0=; b=MGkaAAWiDDhM/K5OZtLcxTQIvWgcVEln/QhbkhdSU6iF6axCS24aoAu66AV2dZlZWJ NaK24CvPrQpXzfPZ0ADsS3lAJMtoD/Afmyu6gH1+pxwPdixtM62315PgbcARbCbafkvS bNXSmTmBcOZub29uFcpsxqAq5nVzv3gSwCQZacnGIAW2FUwym7utmPT8BDimHcH+ACdZ nlaCALqJKgvO8TUP1ZUOvVJzQJ5+3BWobTQd4lnh4ykqcfjPpqG+abSSBAGoldQbIZbd nFWS5LYu/AprzJ3qCPhOmXL1q4rUrE8yZvPyAwsP5T2ypZDiAFNb43od7/bobnlhuALr PWRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=XFoNwmiRWpNpmOeN4HBz6edK6SX4pgenNv89iRzJA+0=; b=t0BOhBNQ4sIhbRVelGfwQSBMTixxo4MiUnyNgGZsxdaDnTl4sUpA0M/BWjzWD9PpD5 KeiuQNpYqBh5W5bl3qr9+44+ekyzefL7PKrhEYWoI7vk16Wl0xCA7X3ACEFzMvaBfpDU To7Q2e/y1dhT0Wz0VYXLdgPI/Z42OHF51qkqPO1GZBn//WVnHD4uocaZjQW3gnXlUx8R n+VLCfOFOwUZkY7KymWBOoDPiaHyTtTpBXuHnez/Bo76lGvdpnjGXvtjNvlyjYGoGPot zV4P2LeE2qfO7qkhA/W2eqse2ThOTTQ6gh4bqJzg+rFcKUfRWoexfdbI8uzjEYZ5ospt Ipig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VcCha4LKfgMwlt3wvtXTSrtMtMTQCNqlyOxuxgasN95r0XvI7 cq18I3cupChEtb/SkBXCEVo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3yQQd7TERf4lYaLgWlZaUS+GmNdzuS0xor7LybejZeQuzRIT6bDmEesM9ZW5w5kqhX9O1vg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1b0d:: with SMTP id q13mr75796pjq.21.1607469910376; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:25:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2405:6580:31a1:500:1ac0:4dff:fe39:5426]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u24sm266812pfm.51.2020.12.08.15.25.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:25:09 -0800 (PST) From: Punit Agrawal To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Wei Huang , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PM , Borislav Petkov , "the arch/x86 maintainers" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list References: <20201125144847.3920-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com> <87zh2tp4x2.fsf@stealth> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 08:25:07 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:55:17 +0100") Message-ID: <87360fq3sc.fsf@stealth> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:45 PM Punit Agrawal wrote: >> >> Hi Rafael, >> >> Punit Agrawal writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > While looking into Giovanni's patches to enable frequency invariance >> > on AMD systems[0], I noticed an issue with initialising frequency >> > domain information on a recent AMD APU. >> > >> > Patch 1 refactors the test to ignore firmware provided frequency >> > domain into a separate function. >> > >> > Patch 2 adds said APU (Family: 0x17, Model: 0x60, Stepping: 0x01) to >> > the list of CPUs for which the PSD override is ignored. I am not quite >> > happy with having to special case a particular CPU but also couldn't >> > find any documentation to help identify the CPUs that don't need the >> > override. >> >> Are you be OK to pick the first two patches if there are no issues? > > Please send them as non-RFC and change the name of override_acpi_psd() > to indicate that it is AMD-specific. Ack - I will incorporate your comments in the next version (once the ongoing discussion finishes). Thanks.