From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1F1C43381 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB36206B6 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 11:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728149AbfBXLtA (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:49:00 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:57421 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725920AbfBXLs7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2019 06:48:59 -0500 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 446jyx0ZTtz9s9T; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:48:57 +1100 (AEDT) From: Michael Ellerman To: Stephen Rothwell , PowerPC Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the powerpc tree In-Reply-To: <20190224010511.74f25272@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20190224010511.74f25272@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:48:57 +1100 Message-ID: <8736odl846.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi all, > > Commit > > f68e7927212f ("Revert "powerpc/book3s32: Reorder _PAGE_XXX flags to simplify TLB handling"") > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author and committer. > > Reverts are commits as well :-) But do they need SOBs? The DCO says: By making a contribution to this project, I certify that: (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file; or (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have the right under that license to submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated in the file; or (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it. (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution are public and that a record of the contribution (including all personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with this project or the open source license(s) involved. Only d) really applies to a revert, and as the maintainer I feel like d) is kind of implied. Anyway I'll try and remember to do it in future if that's The Rule ;) cheers