From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bkBR3-0006iR-0W for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:45:14 +0000 From: "Valo, Kalle" Subject: Re: QCA9984 VHT160 support Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:44:42 +0000 Message-ID: <8737l2ee1y.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <57320C1A.3040604@candelatech.com> <57335A43.4050902@candelatech.com> <573892F5.40706@candelatech.com> <5738AE96.8040800@candelatech.com> <87mvnp6ser.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <572a14ee-d1b5-7b85-d292-51f583f34f17@dd-wrt.com> <87lgyug42q.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: (Sebastian Gottschall's message of "Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:38:39 +0200") Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <374B978C33659A4F953D352AC1C6F6A4@qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Sebastian Gottschall Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Sebastian Gottschall writes: > Am 14.09.2016 um 12:37 schrieb Valo, Kalle: >> Sebastian Gottschall writes: >> >>> Attached you will find a testing patch for VHT160 support. i tested it >>> today on a QCA9984 device and it seems to work. >>> feel free to make any corrections >> Signed-off-by is missing so I can't take this. Can you resend, please > > i can send you a updated version. it tested with vht160 so far. Great, thanks. > however. on codeaurore there is a newer firmware for 9984 which > provides the correct vht flags straight from the firmware but its > crashing in vht160 mode. can you ask the firmware team to provide a > bugfixed version for the official ath10k? with 80p80 and vht160 > support? 80p80 works somewhat bug has wrong vht flags per station, > vht160 works with my quirks so far which are all related to the buggy > firmware I can ask but I need more info. What's the exact location of the newer firmware image? Is there any detailed description about the wrong vht flags bug? -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k