All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, oupton@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	dmatlack@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	qperret@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	andrew.jones@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com,
	alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, gshan@redhat.com, reijiw@google.com,
	rananta@google.com, bgardon@google.com, ricarkol@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:01:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jqq5djt.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230307034555.39733-12-ricarkol@google.com>

On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 03:45:54 +0000,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com> wrote:
> 
> This is the arm64 counterpart of commit cb00a70bd4b7 ("KVM: x86/mmu:
> Split huge pages mapped by the TDP MMU during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG"),
> which has the benefit of splitting the cost of splitting a memslot
> across multiple ioctls.
> 
> Split huge pages on the range specified using KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG.
> And do not split when enabling dirty logging if
> KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET is set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 910aea6bbd1e..d54223b5db97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1089,8 +1089,8 @@ static void kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
>   * @mask:	The mask of pages at offset 'gfn_offset' in this memory
>   *		slot to enable dirty logging on
>   *
> - * Writes protect selected pages to enable dirty logging for them. Caller must
> - * acquire kvm->mmu_lock.
> + * Splits selected pages to PAGE_SIZE and then writes protect them to enable
> + * dirty logging for them. Caller must acquire kvm->mmu_lock.

The code does things in the opposite order...

>   */
>  void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  
>  	stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If initially-all-set mode is not set, then huge-pages were already
> +	 * split when enabling dirty logging: no need to do it again.
> +	 */
> +	if (kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm))

This contradicts the comment. Which one is correct?

> +		kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(kvm, start, end);
>  }
>  
>  static void kvm_send_hwpoison_signal(unsigned long address, short lsb)
> @@ -1889,7 +1896,9 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		 * this when deleting, moving, disabling dirty logging, or
>  		 * creating the memslot (a nop). Doing it for deletes makes
>  		 * sure we don't leak memory, and there's no need to keep the
> -		 * cache around for any of the other cases.
> +		 * cache around for any of the other cases. Keeping the cache
> +		 * is useful for successive KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG calls, which is
> +		 * not handled in this function.

Where is it handled then?

>  		 */
>  		kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
>  	}

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-12 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-07  3:45 [PATCH v6 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] KVM: arm64: Rename free_removed to free_unlinked Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 10:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-13 18:49     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 11:06   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-13 22:23     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 11:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-13 23:58     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-15 18:09       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-15 18:51         ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] KVM: arm64: Export kvm_are_all_memslots_empty() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 11:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-13 15:18     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-14 10:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-15 21:00         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-24  7:41     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-29  4:50   ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-04-10 20:04     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 12:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-04-10 18:32     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] KVM: arm64: Open-code kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 13:01   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-04-10 18:26     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 13:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-04-10 18:22     ` Ricardo Koller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874jqq5djt.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@gmail.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.