From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=lKFn=6G=lists.ozlabs.org=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B193C55189
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:18:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E4A206CD
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:18:09 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 23E4A206CD
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deneb.enyo.de
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3])
	by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496WxC47SHzDr08
	for <linuxppc-dev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:18:07 +1000 (AEST)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized)
 smtp.mailfrom=deneb.enyo.de (client-ip=37.24.231.21; helo=albireo.enyo.de;
 envelope-from=fw@deneb.enyo.de; receiver=<UNKNOWN>)
Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deneb.enyo.de
Received: from albireo.enyo.de (albireo.enyo.de [37.24.231.21])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest
 SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496Wt94FGjzDqkh
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:15:26 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de)
 by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 id 1jR9bA-0005gC-UO; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:15:08 +0000
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <fw@deneb.enyo.de>)
 id 1jR9bA-0007nX-Pz; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:15:08 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [musl] Re: Powerpc Linux 'scv' system call ABI proposal take 2
References: <1586931450.ub4c8cq8dj.astroid@bobo.none>
 <20200415225539.GL11469@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <c2612908-67f7-cceb-d121-700dea096016@linaro.org>
 <20200416153756.GU11469@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <4b2a7a56-dd2b-1863-50e5-2f4cdbeef47c@linaro.org>
 <20200416175932.GZ11469@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <4f824a37-e660-8912-25aa-fde88d4b79f3@linaro.org>
 <20200416183151.GA11469@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <1587344003.daumxvs1kh.astroid@bobo.none>
 <b77fa2dc769d42e1a3e68f5edf90d250@AcuMS.aculab.com>
 <20200421143941.GJ11469@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <960127e0-57a0-55b4-f309-ae0a675c7756@linaro.org>
 <1587536988.ivnp421w2w.astroid@bobo.none>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:15:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1587536988.ivnp421w2w.astroid@bobo.none> (Nicholas Piggin's
 message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:54:18 +1000")
Message-ID: <874ktcng8z.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
 "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
 musl@lists.openwall.com, David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
 Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
 "libc-dev@lists.llvm.org" <libc-dev@lists.llvm.org>,
 "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org
Sender: "Linuxppc-dev"
 <linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org>

* Nicholas Piggin:

> Another option would be to use a different signal. I don't see that any 
> are more suitable.

SIGSYS comes to my mind.  But I don't know how exclusively it is
associated with seccomp these days.