From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2863C65C30 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 12:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830A52147D for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 12:10:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 830A52147D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727802AbeJFTN1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Oct 2018 15:13:27 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:59651 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727202AbeJFTN1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Oct 2018 15:13:27 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42S56l6S2Gz9s1x; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 22:10:23 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au From: Michael Ellerman To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , PowerPC , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Christophe Leroy Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree In-Reply-To: <20181005224606.2372fece@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20181005161406.73ef8727@canb.auug.org.au> <87d0sok3dm.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <20181005224606.2372fece@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 22:10:23 +1000 Message-ID: <874ldzjmxc.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 22:02:45 +1000 Michael Ellerman wrote: >> >> Ah fudge, what are the chances we add a new include of bootmem.h just as >> Mike's removing bootmem. > > In my experience, it was almost certain ... almost every API removal > conflicts with new added uses. :-) I suppose. Though the last time we added a new include of bootmem.h was 2015, and that should have actually been memblock.h. >> I could just apply that to my tree. memblock.h is where early_memtest() is >> actually defined anyway. > > However min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn are defined in bootmem.h until > after it is removed. OK. I guess I'll leave it for Andrew to squash in to the series. cheers From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D73C65C30 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 12:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7722147D for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 12:12:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2C7722147D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42S5941cLXzF3cs for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 22:12:24 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42S56m43tczF3bS for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 22:10:24 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42S56l6S2Gz9s1x; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 22:10:23 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au From: Michael Ellerman To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree In-Reply-To: <20181005224606.2372fece@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20181005161406.73ef8727@canb.auug.org.au> <87d0sok3dm.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <20181005224606.2372fece@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 22:10:23 +1000 Message-ID: <874ldzjmxc.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-Next Mailing List , Andrew Morton , PowerPC Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Stephen Rothwell writes: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 22:02:45 +1000 Michael Ellerman wrote: >> >> Ah fudge, what are the chances we add a new include of bootmem.h just as >> Mike's removing bootmem. > > In my experience, it was almost certain ... almost every API removal > conflicts with new added uses. :-) I suppose. Though the last time we added a new include of bootmem.h was 2015, and that should have actually been memblock.h. >> I could just apply that to my tree. memblock.h is where early_memtest() is >> actually defined anyway. > > However min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn are defined in bootmem.h until > after it is removed. OK. I guess I'll leave it for Andrew to squash in to the series. cheers