From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751145AbdBABTa (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:19:30 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:47435 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750978AbdBABT2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:19:28 -0500 From: Michael Ellerman To: Tony Luck , Hari Bathini Cc: "Yu\, Fenghua" , "linux-ia64\@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Young , kexec-ml , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "vgoyal\@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions In-Reply-To: References: <148363729327.11570.6244765717789390817.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <148363740554.11570.4870634597647436827.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <20170106020324.GB2863@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <38a7807c-cd95-670d-30d3-c45e7921ea11@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0748026f-a459-9022-3658-a75cb0633f40@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:11:28 +1100 Message-ID: <874m0evhof.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tony Luck writes: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hari Bathini > wrote: >> I haven't gotten a success/failure build report from zero-day. Not sure what >> to make of it. > > zero-day is generally silent unless it sees a problem. So no news is good news. > >> But I did try cross-compiling and it was successful. Should that do? > > I guess so. What tree do these apply to? I tried 4.10-rc5 and "git am" > protested ... but I didn't look closely as at why. Don't worry about it, I do an ia64_defconfig build as part of my usual tests before pushing. cheers From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([2401:3900:2:1::2]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1cYjSq-0005m5-1r for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 01:12:01 +0000 From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions In-Reply-To: References: <148363729327.11570.6244765717789390817.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <148363740554.11570.4870634597647436827.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <20170106020324.GB2863@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <38a7807c-cd95-670d-30d3-c45e7921ea11@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0748026f-a459-9022-3658-a75cb0633f40@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:11:28 +1100 Message-ID: <874m0evhof.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "kexec" Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tony Luck , Hari Bathini Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kexec-ml , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , Dave Young , "vgoyal@redhat.com" Tony Luck writes: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hari Bathini > wrote: >> I haven't gotten a success/failure build report from zero-day. Not sure what >> to make of it. > > zero-day is generally silent unless it sees a problem. So no news is good news. > >> But I did try cross-compiling and it was successful. Should that do? > > I guess so. What tree do these apply to? I tried 4.10-rc5 and "git am" > protested ... but I didn't look closely as at why. Don't worry about it, I do an ia64_defconfig build as part of my usual tests before pushing. cheers _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Ellerman Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 01:11:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions Message-Id: <874m0evhof.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> List-Id: References: <148363729327.11570.6244765717789390817.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <148363740554.11570.4870634597647436827.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> <20170106020324.GB2863@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <38a7807c-cd95-670d-30d3-c45e7921ea11@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0748026f-a459-9022-3658-a75cb0633f40@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <04b96f50-f77d-9446-975f-7d44accfe583@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tony Luck , Hari Bathini Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Dave Young , kexec-ml , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "vgoyal@redhat.com" Tony Luck writes: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hari Bathini > wrote: >> I haven't gotten a success/failure build report from zero-day. Not sure what >> to make of it. > > zero-day is generally silent unless it sees a problem. So no news is good news. > >> But I did try cross-compiling and it was successful. Should that do? > > I guess so. What tree do these apply to? I tried 4.10-rc5 and "git am" > protested ... but I didn't look closely as at why. Don't worry about it, I do an ia64_defconfig build as part of my usual tests before pushing. cheers