From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934842AbcHEAae (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:30:34 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f68.google.com ([209.85.220.68]:34551 "EHLO mail-pa0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934813AbcHEAac (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:30:32 -0400 From: Daniel Axtens To: Michael Ellerman , wei.guo.simon@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Shuah Khan , Anton Blanchard , Cyril Bur , Anshuman Khandual , Simon Guo , Ulrich Weigand , Michael Neuling , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Rashmica Gupta , Khem Raj , Jessica Yu , Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Suraj Jitindar Singh , Chris Smart , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/30] powerpc/ptrace: Adapt gpr32_get, gpr32_set functions for transaction In-Reply-To: <87r3a5ey5i.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> References: <1469674679-8580-1-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> <1469674679-8580-7-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> <877fbxqbvd.fsf@possimpible.ozlabs.ibm.com> <87r3a5ey5i.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 10:30:15 +1000 Message-ID: <874m70qcq0.fsf@possimpible.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Michael Ellerman writes: >> Is there a nice simple fix we could deploy to squash this warning, or >> will we just live with it? > > This series has been nothing but pain. Given we're already at v13, and people > really want this support to go in, I'm going to leave it in the tree. > > Once it's in we can refactor the implementation, which is a bit of a mess, and > hopefully in the process fix the warnings. OK, I'll push this onto my stack to look at again in a couple of months. Regards, Daniel --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXo94XAAoJEPC3R3P2I92FdN8QAMGhIDCSkIe2YOdbmDaPKGMu r5+zLhkKtajQLVCH7YdgFVcAHqg2zBl4VEw+NrwdvpOlXFgt+Ozr5ykcCxQKYUDQ C5El0qUq86qajSkmGQoDjZfT2g/J5lbOF/B9MdeP+nUcMnIo6MLBirehuqcsbXUL A+UYWAkeoWzBMWnZpwG/gtQIySMJRx9Agtk3INbL34TFDyZZP76jwUIw9PO1wxuT LU3pb/zUWNFfiQjuDIv/plDMxpl2hmZQrRSuyq8mQWnWm/fuTejR0rPI94LmHXT3 tvIC9V8uE/V9YI+n9pCjizTh0UxfRkN/9rMsOizg/fxqPt5cjKoTerG7h5FDRmGf YPLR09OV2LXZUXQOhQrY0iaHiD1/HR91YD9LvupBasYN5FRR6uGswoSpluy450PD UviyEH4paKtScaBIlllsReXdqef4koZRAce59yIQOlpAH/96Az8G2lZYrPnm9p1E CvosQBobEVLdtGFULD/OG4nm7Pbd5SuzydJzNwyGpwX/xYUAPKRaHt6cAfUkRsQ9 dLusFEcNMapcJ9xBqNTuWzRSycYUvvBpKFsiPSAjR6Sdqk86qsGMw2axzxi48tBu MgY6y8vH3eJ8NgRW0tQwi6orEPWmtBaQaKSH7b/K4vJwooVHBqauTDuX370PwEgz 0j6sCZS8VSuBjWtJjI6C =i0Kk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--