From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Riedy Subject: Re: No NCQ support on X61s Ultrabay? (Intel ICH8 SATA controller question) Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 18:35:41 -0400 Message-ID: <874ow1ak76.fsf@sparse.dyndns.org> References: <49F90CA2.4080602@garzik.org> <20090430083309.437f9248@lithium.local.net> <49F95719.10701@kernel.org> <20090430144702.46415b90@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090430153508.GA10704@linux.intel.com> <20090430154701.GA27737@srcf.ucam.org> <49FA5519.9000107@gmail.com> <49FCFC5D.5050303@kernel.org> <49FE038F.2040704@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from a.mail.sonic.net ([64.142.16.245]:34707 "EHLO a.mail.sonic.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753058AbZECXRj (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 May 2009 19:17:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49FE038F.2040704@gmail.com> (Robert Hancock's message of "Sun, 03 May 2009 14:50:23 -0600") Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Robert Hancock Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux IDE mailing list And Robert Hancock writes: > Well, it's a potential concern, but it's simple enough I doubt it > would really result in much of a burden. My D620 is one of those that corrupted the file system with the force-AHCI patch. If I hadn't applied the patch externally, I might have guessed it was the file system code... Given all the churn in the fs code right now, is it wise to add another *known* corruption vector? Jason